Re: 100% observational certainty
- From: ukastronomy <martin_piers_nicholson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
On 17 Mar, 08:38, oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1999/11/video/b
It takes two 360 degree motions with respect to the central Sun to
account for the seasons and variations in the natural noon cycle,the
orbital component may initially be tricky to spot but it has already
been observationally isolated apart from the separate motion of daily
rotation and its specific orientation which that motion generates.
The quasi-dynamic is simply a consequence of orbital specifics and it
is a 100 % observational certainty -
http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infrared/UranusAo/ur_time_2001_2005.jpg
You identified a link that, I assume, offers supporting evidence for
your claim.
So .... please explain exactly what these images show and how they
support your views.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 100% observational certainty
- From: oriel36
- Re: 100% observational certainty
- References:
- 100% observational certainty
- From: oriel36
- 100% observational certainty
- Prev by Date: CCD or DSLR?
- Next by Date: Re: SAA OBSERVING: A Cloudy Evening at QUO
- Previous by thread: 100% observational certainty
- Next by thread: Re: 100% observational certainty
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|