Re: AviStack versus Registax for planetary?
- From: lal_truckee <lal_truckee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:22:58 -0700
Seth Waterston wrote:
I am reading about the latest buzz, AviStack for processing lunar/solar/planetary images. The thing that has the most potential, from what I see, is the many more alignment points that can be used than in Registax. However, I am wondering if there are more comparison images of planets. I see a lot of lunar comparisons, but most of my Avis are planetary collected over several years. If I can see some comparisons of planets, like Jupiter, taken with each program I might consider reprocessing with AviStack. Can anyone offer some links of planetary comparison between the two programs?
Thanks in advance,
Been waiting for a reply - I guess it's up to you to explore the packages and provide a report on the pros and cons of each..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AviStack versus Registax for planetary?
- From: Andrew Smallshaw
- Re: AviStack versus Registax for planetary?
- References:
- AviStack versus Registax for planetary?
- From: Seth Waterston
- AviStack versus Registax for planetary?
- Prev by Date: Re: Unified Field; Gravity Generator
- Next by Date: Re: Simple Online FITS File Viewer?
- Previous by thread: AviStack versus Registax for planetary?
- Next by thread: Re: AviStack versus Registax for planetary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
