Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: Dave Typinski <möbius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:51:54 -0400
wsnell01@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In this example we are only concerned with what the front surface of
the objective sees compared with what the observer were to see if he
looked at the ruler from the location of the objective. The objective
could be a Newtonian primary mirror which would be _more_ distant from
the object than is the eyepiece.
Aha, good point.
But still, it's not clear to me why the only distance that counts is
the one between the object and the objective lens (or primary mirror).
I guess I'm going to have to go learn about it by actually reading a
textbook and doing some exercises.
....the horror, the horror...
--
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: wsnell01
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- References:
- Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: Eugene
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: Dave Typinski
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: wsnell01
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: Dave Typinski
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: wsnell01
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: Dave Typinski
- Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- From: wsnell01
- Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- Prev by Date: Re: Those of us trying to help Kelleher
- Next by Date: Solar Obseerving Advice
- Previous by thread: Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- Next by thread: Re: Field of View and Magnfication calculations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|