Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Eugene <eugenhughes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 22, 1:31 pm, Chris L Peterson <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:14:10 -0700 (PDT), Eugene <eugenhug...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Now to tie it up to sky photography. When using the
image 60X image (taken with your 3000fl scope)
in my computer and zooming it, the magnification
can be greater. This is what astrophotographers
consider and do. They simply love to zoom to
see the pixels to arrive at the true resolution. Agree?
Not really. Any imagers, of the sky or otherwise, will often study their
images at whatever size is necessary to see the most possible detail.
Neither normally refer to absolute magnification (like 60X) when they
work with images, because it is meaningless and confusing.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com
But without the pixel or digital capability and using simply
analog film 35mm camera.. one can refer to it as 60X
when the analog camera is used in your 3000mm fl
SCT, isn't it. So telephoto with 50mm as 1X and
100mm as 2X and 3000mm as 60X is valid only
for analog film where there is no way to look
at the details because of the resolution limit of
our eyes unless the image is blown up to portrait size
(to bring out more details and it is here that
mere magnification is not enough). Right?
Anyway. Do you believe that any details that our
eyes can see such as 400X in jupiter can also
be seen by the digicam?? Or are there details
where only our eyes can see that can't be
seen by digicams (in the same scope)?
E
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: AM
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- References:
- Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Eugene
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Eugene
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Eugene
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Eugene
- Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- Prev by Date: Re: Cleaning Fungus
- Next by Date: Re: Good news from Antarctica
- Previous by thread: Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- Next by thread: Re: Eyes vs Digicam in SCT Imaging
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|