Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: "Curtis Croulet" <calypte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 03:56:30 GMT
Feckwit, for a guy who refuses to acknowledge any frame of reference
other than that of the solar system itself, I'm surprised that you
dare claim that a planet moves in a "counter-clockwise direction". Of
course, you neglected to tell us from which frame this is true.
I was scratching my head over this one, too. "Counterclockwise" referenced
to what?
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California
33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- References:
- Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: palsing
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: skywave
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: palsing
- Geosynchronous orbits
- Prev by Date: Re: Amateur radio astronomy?
- Next by Date: Re: What have we learned from Hubble about building telescopes?
- Previous by thread: Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- Next by thread: Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- Index(es):