Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: "Curtis Croulet" <calypte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 16:16:04 GMT
You totally miss the contradiction of, on the one hand, claiming there is no
external frame of reference for planetary motions, but then claiming a
planet moves counterclockwise.
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California
33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- References:
- Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: palsing
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: skywave
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: palsing
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: Curtis Croulet
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Geosynchronous orbits
- Prev by Date: Re: So much for Mars: Obongo will make African chief of Nasa
- Next by Date: The disparity between technology and astronomy
- Previous by thread: Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- Next by thread: Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|