Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: palsing <palsing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
On May 16, 11:37 pm, oriel36 Feckwit> wrote:
If you wish to understand this,stop scratching your head,pick up a
broom and walk around a some object keeping the broom pointing in the
same direction at all times.
*******************
Well, there you go, you have finally admitted it yourself, and this is
exactly what everyone else has been saying all along. If you keep the
broom pointing in the same direction at all times, like, for example,
at Polaris, then clearly IT IS NOT TURNING AT ALL WITH RESPECT TO THE
ESSENTIALLY FIXED STARS. Pointing in the same direction is the
equivalent of not turning. What could be easier to understand?
Have you finally, if inadvertently, come to your senses?
\Paul A
.
- References:
- Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: palsing
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: skywave
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: palsing
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: Curtis Croulet
- Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- From: oriel36
- Geosynchronous orbits
- Prev by Date: Re: What have we learned from Hubble about building telescopes?
- Next by Date: Re: Martian fossil bones
- Previous by thread: Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- Next by thread: Re: Geosynchronous orbits
- Index(es):