Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: palsing <palsing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 9, 12:02 pm, Morten Reistad <fi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And why so many of them are attracted to astronomy, even if they
get it totally wrong even at the outset.
These basic frame of reference errors are very common among
students.
*************
I agree. The difference is that you can explain to the student why his
error is an error, and with patience and an able teacher, he will
quickly get it right.
Unfortunatley, this is not true of Gerald, he seems to have no
capacity to learn anything that might change the way he views the
universe. He feels that his intelligence is 'intuitive' and he rejects
empirical data and calls it irrelevant.
\Paul A
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: Skywise
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: Morten Reistad
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: oriel36
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- References:
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: Skywise
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: oriel36
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: Skywise
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- From: Morten Reistad
- Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- Prev by Date: Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- Next by Date: Re: Rotational signatures
- Previous by thread: Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- Next by thread: Re: The 3 minute 56 second illusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|