Re: errors of Wikipedia
- From: Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:22:15 GMT
"John H. Bell IV" <binocularsrgreat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:h0r0jd$uvi$1
@news.eternal-september.org:
"
"Meme Mr. Mustard" <meme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JC%Xl.30122$Db2.14839@xxxxxxxxxxx
The OP'er must have just woke up from a 5 year coma. Wiki is fine now.
If you think it's fine and doesn't bear scrutiny, look up historical
information. Much of it is uncorrected.
I just love all these people complaining about the inaccuracies
of Wikipedia, but how many of you have actually gone in and made
corrections?
THAT is the whole point of a wiki.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: errors of Wikipedia
- From: Andrew Smallshaw
- Re: errors of Wikipedia
- From: Golden California Girls
- Re: errors of Wikipedia
- References:
- errors of Wikipedia
- From: John H. Bell IV
- Re: errors of Wikipedia
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: errors of Wikipedia
- From: Meme Mr. Mustard
- Re: errors of Wikipedia
- From: John H. Bell IV
- errors of Wikipedia
- Prev by Date: Re: Rotational signatures
- Next by Date: Re: Kelleher
- Previous by thread: Re: errors of Wikipedia
- Next by thread: Re: errors of Wikipedia
- Index(es):