Re: Bill Bryson and the big bang

From: Franz Heymann (notfranz.heymann_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 06/25/04 

Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:17:57 +0000 (UTC)

"greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message
news:10dlt554enqlm26@corp.supernews.com...
> Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in
message
> news:cbbfpv$jpu$2@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
> > greywolf42 wrote:
> > > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in
message
> > > news:cb9ebv$b5r$2@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
> > >
> > >>Franz Heymann wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>"FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >>>news:2jq428F13rmleU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > >
> > >
> > > {snip}
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>http://www.slac.stanford.edu/exp/e144/e144.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>>But Bjoern said *two* lasers. Not an electron beam and a
laser.
> > >>>
> > >>>I am not aware of experiments on photon-photon interactions
involving
> > >>>2 lasers.
> > >>
> > >>As I already pointed out in another post, I misremembered.
Sorry.
> > >
> > > We all make boo-boos from time to time.
> >
> > So you did see my admission here that I misremembered? Then why
did
> > you state in another post that I "made this up"? I would call this
> > "slander".
>
> Your knowledge of the law is poor. Aside from the truth being a
defense,
> slander is a term used only for verbal communication.

Have you no more cogent comments to make?

> > > I enjoyed seeing Franz melt down to try to cover your fanny.
> >
> > Err, Franz essentially *corrected* me, so what on earth are you
talking
> > about???
>
> Franz' reference (E144) had nothing to do with your claim about
crossed
> lasers.
>
> I originally had simply thought that you were referring to theory,
instead
> of an experiment. I guess I was wrong.

What purpose do the weasel words "I guess" serve in that sentence?

FRanz

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bill Bryson and the big bang
    ... laser. ... > Your knowledge of the law is poor. ... > Franz' reference had nothing to do with your claim about ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Lets talk about radar/laser detectors
    ... the laser beam is so small that it only baths a small portion of your car. ... And I bet the first time that state law were to be challenged by the Federal law that says states and local municipalities shall not interfere with the right of a lawful citizen to erect antennas to receive the airwaves, the airwaves belong to the people; ... They recently overturned the gun ban in DC so maybe the detector ban is next. ...
    (rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang)
  • Re: Lets talk about radar/laser detectors
    ... the laser beam is so small that it only baths a small portion of your car. ... And I bet the first time that state law were to be challenged by the Federal law that says states and local municipalities shall not interfere with the right of a lawful citizen to erect antennas to receive the airwaves, the airwaves belong to the people; ... They recently overturned the gun ban in DC so maybe the detector ban is next. ...
    (rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang)
  • Re: Lets talk about radar/laser detectors
    ... laser beam is so small that it only baths a small portion of your car. ... And I bet the first time that state law were to be challenged by the ... receive the airwaves, the airwaves belong to the people; ... the intent and the ability to use one to avoid compliance with the ...
    (rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang)
  • Re: Flash Blinded By Green Laser
    ... look Gary, the guy might've been stupid, and an as***hole, but what LAW did ... Don't tell me please that every moron that buys a $50 laser on ... This would be even more stupid than having to read all FCC rule books when ... I didn't see any law mentioned at any time in the places these lasers are ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)