Re: Nancy & Zetas (REQUESTS)

From: Volker Hetzer (volker.hetzer_at_ieee.org)
Date: 07/02/04 

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:23:42 +0200

"Cosmic Surfer" <judoka0061@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:f4317f7a.0407020032.515702b@posting.google.com...
> >"Volker Hetzer" <volker.hetzer@ieee.org> wrote in message >news:cc1lu$gfu$1@nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com>...
>
> BTW : http://www.geocities.com/judoka_61/Bender_01.html
>
> Why Caponi photos cannot be analyze instrumentally ?
> Com'on ..if the extraterrestrial do not exist why do not analyze those
> photos ?
>
> > What for? You can't figure out whether they are fakes by "analyzing"
> > scans of photos,
>
> #(polaroid pictures)
Whatever. Where did he hand in the originals?

> >except for some obvious oddities like the eyes
> > in the fourth picture.
> >Besides, if the guy was that near, why didn't he
> > cut off a tissue sample from the supposed body?
> (why the guy did not a cup of coffee or had a chat with the humanoid)
Good question.

> >All he did have to do was to stick a twig into it and take it home.
> (all he did have to do was to stick a lighting rod into...)
Was the body charged? Looked kinda wet to me.

> Anyway, since that humanoid is a fraud, why the authorities don't
> analyze instrumentally those six polaroid pictures ? ...obviusly
> because you can't !
> ..and I am obviusly kicking major bigot's *** right now.
I gave the reasons above. You chose not to respond and to repeat the question.

As for the other story, well, for me it's a story unless corrobated by
real evidence.

Lots of Greetings!
Volker

Quantcast