Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?
From: vonroach (hadrainc_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/14/04
- Next message: Dave Typinski: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: Democrats had better WATCH IT!"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:34:53 GMT
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:05:42 +0200, Bjoern Feuerbacher
<feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
>The light from a supernova obviously gets dimmer with time.
The original collapse happens quickly.
> The time
>scale for this "decay" can be measured, and compared to the time
>scale on which it *should* happen (based both on observations on
>supernovae which are closer to us, and on our theories of stellar
>evolution).
Sorry, I'm skeptical of theories based on very meager observations.
>The result is: for supernovae which are far away, the time
>scale is different - exactly in agreement with the time dilation
>predictions of the BBT.
The predictions are for the big bang, not a little bang, far distant
in spacetime from the big bang and from us.
- Next message: Dave Typinski: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: Democrats had better WATCH IT!"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|