Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?
From: vonroach (hadrainc_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/17/04
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Previous message: smartly: "Re: GR 17, Hal Puthoff, Non-equilibrium Physics"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:44:27 GMT
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:33:55 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>Your words were:
> | Björn "the GRist", very carefully replied: "Well, there is no
> | absolute time, the clock readings depend on the frame of reference.
> | Dirk is perfectly right to claim that my clock slowed down,
> | but I am also perfectly right to claim that his clock is now
> | slow wrt my clock. I don't know if the two clocks are now ticking
> | at the same rate, but they could nevertheless show the same time
> | at landing.".
>Björn never wrote these words. You fabricated them.
>You are a pathetic fraud.
>
>Dirk Vdm
>
Absolute time? Could we agree on `0' at moment of big bang, if the
theory is correct? After that the frames of reference multiply very
rapidly.
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Previous message: smartly: "Re: GR 17, Hal Puthoff, Non-equilibrium Physics"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|