Re: revisiting Apollo
From: Jaxtraw (jaxtraw_at_nospamnobigfoot.com)
Date: 07/19/04
- Next message: Dr_Postman: "Re: Another "Pole Shift""
- Previous message: Jaxtraw: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- In reply to: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Next in thread: Paul Lawler: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Paul Lawler: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:17:21 +0100
"Yoda" <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:NTCKc.1058008$Ar.1043058@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
>
>
> Jaxtraw wrote:
>
> > "Yoda" <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > news:0oCKc.1057568$Ar.420193@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> >
> >>
> >>Paul Lawler wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Yoda" <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:5UBKc.1057107$Ar.919641@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Don't any of you guys think for yourselves or are you all sycophants?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Sycophants to WHOM, pray tell?
> >>
> >>To what you consider to be the big arse you must kiss so that you can be
> >>admited into the big arse club of the neo-scientific stone age cavemen.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>>>The US government openly admitted recently that the moon pictures
were
> >>>>>>hoaxed on the direct order of President Nixon. And to top it all
off,
> >>>>>>Stanley Kubrick is the man responsible for the moon landing hoaxed
> >>>>>>pictures. In fact nothing was televised from the moon missions to
any
> >>>>>>home in the entire world. What people watched was made in a studio.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I'm sorry... please point me to the government documents and/or
> >>>
> >>>offiicials
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>who "openly admitted" the moon pictures were hoaxed. Names please,
not
> >>>>>"unnamed" or "highly placed" sources.
> >>
> >>Againn go to the CBC and ask them. Is that so hard?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I daresay none of us have a copy of this documentary to hand, so could
you
> > just be a good chap and tell us what you think it said?
> >
> > By the by, I'm pretty certain that if the US govt. had officially
admitted
> > to faking the Apollo programme,
>
> When did I say the Apollo programme itself was hoaxed? Please quote me
> on that please do.
>
>
> it would have been front page news in every
> > country in the world, so even here in Ukay I'm surprised I missed it.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
>
> Again for those who need it spelled out for them.....take an H, take an
> A, take an O, take an X, put them together,....what does that spell?
Um, HAOX?
> Hoax right? Now take a V, take an I, take a D, take an E, and take an
> O, and put them together ok? What does that spell? Video...right. Now
> take a P, take an I, take a C, take a T, take an I, take an R, take an
> E, take an S, and put that together...what does that spell?
PICTIRES? Gee. this is fun.
> Pictures..right....now we are getting somewhere. Do you understand yet,
> or do you still need it spelled out for you?
>
Well, I got HAOX VIDEO PICTIRES. In which of these HAOX VIDEO PICTIRES does
the government of the USA make an official announcement that NASA faked the
moon shots, or parts thereof?
Ian
-- ____________________ A quality online comic strip for the discerning reader. With shagging in it. http://www.jaxtrawstudios.com
- Next message: Dr_Postman: "Re: Another "Pole Shift""
- Previous message: Jaxtraw: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- In reply to: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Next in thread: Paul Lawler: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Paul Lawler: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|