Re: Another "Pole Shift"

From: Dr_Postman (Looky_at_mysig.foremail)
Date: 07/19/04 

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 00:05:33 GMT

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:19:18 GMT, Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com>
wrote:

>
>
>DrPostman wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
>>>wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
>>>polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
>>>during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
>>>for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.
>>
>>
>> That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
>> http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html
>
>My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
> Perhaps you should get some new glasses.

They weren't "near perfectly preserved" either. They don't even think
they can get what they need to try to clone them.

>>
>>>Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
>>>slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to a
>>>cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the
>>
>>
>> Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
>> of plates.
>
>No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
>I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
>the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
>land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.

The flipping of the magnetic fields will take several decades, if not
centuries. This will cause no earthquakes. The two are not related.

>>
>>
>>
>>>mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
>>>earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
>>>and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
>>>reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
>>>polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new stellar
>>>alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core releasing
>>>massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
>>>confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?
>>
>>
>> Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.
>
>You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
>at the evidence which already does exist.

You are making some silly assumptions. I have looked at the
"evidence"
and found it wanting, if not out right wrong. Care to refute the
following?
http://www.planet-x.150m.com/nopoleshift.html
http://www.pibburns.com/smmia5.htm

>> On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
>> years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
>> in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.
>
>You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.

You are confused over what ice core samples can prove.
Educate yourself:
http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/~ecoogan/ACSChicago_files/frame.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icecores.html

>>>How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
>>>pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
>>>some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
>>>perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
>>>artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
>>>under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?
>>
>>
>> There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.
>
>You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.

Where is your proof that there are? I saw the Han*** show, he
pointed out no pyramids. The data from the museum in Cuba that
backed the last expedition doesn't show any pyramids either (unless
I missed it in all the pics.)

>> As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
>> web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,
>
>What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
>agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
>wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.

What I have researched seems to trump your ad hominems all to hell.

> with
>> wave action proving how they were formed.
>
>How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
>that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
>nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.

Sure thing, ***:

"The Japanese sites of Yonaguni and Kerama are natural rock, with no
sign of archaeological significance. Again, I informed Han***'s film
company in June 2000 that these sites were natural, and that there
were better sites to visit. This information was ignored, although all
the documents and reports on better sites are in the public domain
(see bibliography, below). The Japanese Nippon TV company showed me
video recordings of the Yonaguni site in about 1992 and I considered
it to obviously be natural rock, an opinion that was reported on
Japanese domestic television."
source: http://www.hallofmaat.com/maat/article.php?sid=36&page=1

> Even the TV show
>> were Han*** tries to prove they are man made the geologist
>> with him says otherwise.
>
>Just like you I suppose, you can prove that there is no such thing as
>sunken artifical cities.

I didn't post that, now did I, ***? I have scuba dived on one,
have you?

> The claim for Cuba is even more silly.
>
>Thats why National Geographic is doing a report on it, because of its
>silly factor.

No, the claims that are being made are silly because a LOT more data
is needed. More than one dive, and a closer one at that, is needed.
I bet you don't even know the extent of the first expedition, do you?

>> So far all they have done is find rocks that might be man
>> made, but a LOT of closer investigation is needed before
>> any conclusion can be reached.
>
>Idiots always need "closer investigation" in order to see their own arse.

Are you calling the museum that backed the expedition "idiots"?
What is wrong with verifying data? Are you so afraid of confirmation?

>> http://www.cuba.cu/ciencia/citma/ama/museo/exmari.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>>http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/landofmammoth/dispatches/clonezone.html
>>
>>
>> That article is about trying to clone extinct animals (and btw, it
>> concludes that it will be impossible).
>
>Duh!

Then why throw it in there, dumbass? It has nothing to do with the
subject.

>>>www.teamatlantis.com
>>>
>>>Might we add the recent discoveries of sunken structures and cities
>>>found in the Meditteraean and other areas?
>>
>>
>> Sure, you can add them, but you'd better be ready to support
>> weird theories with exceptional evidence.
>
>Its you who has the weird theory....er weirder response. Go back and
>look at the evidence before you open your stupid arse mouth for all to see.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Get used to it.

And you even suck at the ad hominems, let alone backing up your
claims. 

--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD;    "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com
"Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?"
  - Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how
     sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time.