Re: Another "Pole Shift"

From: Wally Anglesea (wanglese_at_spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au)
Date: 07/19/04 

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 02:23:57 GMT

"Yoda" <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:C0GKc.1061109$Ar.436529@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
>
>
> Dr_Postman wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:19:18 GMT, Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>DrPostman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
> >>>>wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
> >>>>polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
> >>>>during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
> >>>>for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
> >>>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
> >>>http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html
> >>
> >>My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
> >> Perhaps you should get some new glasses.
> >
> >
> > They weren't "near perfectly preserved" either. They don't even think
> > they can get what they need to try to clone them.
>
> You read about one (1) Mammoth discovery and now you think you know
> everything?

You accept whack theories as fact and you expect to be taken seriously?

>
> >
> >
> >
> >>>>Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
> >>>>slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to
a
> >>>>cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
> >>>of plates.
>
> I am not the one confused here, it is you.
>
> >>
> >>No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
> >>I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
> >>the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
> >>land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.
> >
> >
> > The flipping of the magnetic fields will take several decades, if not
> > centuries. This will cause no earthquakes. The two are not related.
>
> Says who? You.....hahahahahahaha
>

And you have alternate actual evidence?

> >
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
> >>>>earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
> >>>>and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
> >>>>reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
> >>>>polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new
stellar
> >>>>alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core
releasing
> >>>>massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
> >>>>confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.
> >>
> >>You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
> >>at the evidence which already does exist.
> >
> >
> > You are making some silly assumptions. I have looked at the
> > "evidence"
>
> What evidence did you look at? A silly attempt to clone Mammoths?
> Hhahahahahahaha
>
> > and found it wanting, if not out right wrong. Care to refute the
> > following?
> > http://www.planet-x.150m.com/nopoleshift.html
> > http://www.pibburns.com/smmia5.htm
>
> You call those two web sites evidence? And then you have the nerve to
> say I support those web sites? Man you are a dumb ass.
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
> >>>years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
> >>>in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.
> >>
> >>You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.
> >
> >
> > You are confused over what ice core samples can prove.
>
> Pfftt...why dont you just go away or hide in a corner. Stop telling me
> what I believe or do not believe. I can speak for myself. Idiot.
>
> > Educate yourself:
>
> While you are at...do the same. ANd take that dunce cap off, it makes
> you look bad.
>
> > http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/~ecoogan/ACSChicago_files/frame.htm
> > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icecores.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>>How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
> >>>>pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
> >>>>some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
> >>>>perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
> >>>>artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
> >>>>under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.
> >>
> >>You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.
> >
> >
> > Where is your proof that there are?
>
>
> Like you care. You already stated there is no proof or evidence of
> underwater structures... now you ask me where is the proof. You really
> like to pick fights dont you.
>
>
> I saw the Han*** show, he
> > pointed out no pyramids. The data from the museum in Cuba that
> > backed the last expedition doesn't show any pyramids either (unless
> > I missed it in all the pics.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
> >>>web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,
> >>
> >>What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
> >>agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
> >>wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.
> >
> >
> > What I have researched seems to trump your ad hominems all to hell.
>
> It actually shows how much of a dumb arse you are..your socalled
> "research" isnt worth half of what my toilet paper is worth.
>
> >
> >
> >
> >> with
> >>
> >>>wave action proving how they were formed.
>
> There is no wave action of water that produces perfectly horizontal and
> vertical walls as yet in any scientific paper I have seen? Please show
> me the quotes which scientists who claims water erosion can make
> perfectly aligned vertical walls and horizontal steps? Please do show
> your incredible (sic) research?
>
> >>
> >>How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
> >>that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
> >>nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.
> >
> >
> > Sure thing, ***:
> >
> > "The Japanese sites of Yonaguni and Kerama are natural rock, with no
> > sign of archaeological significance. Again, I informed Han***'s film
> > company in June 2000 that these sites were natural, and that there
> > were better sites to visit. This information was ignored, although all
> > the documents and reports on better sites are in the public domain
> > (see bibliography, below). The Japanese Nippon TV company showed me
> > video recordings of the Yonaguni site in about 1992 and I considered
> > it to obviously be natural rock, an opinion that was reported on
> > Japanese domestic television."
> > source: http://www.hallofmaat.com/maat/article.php?sid=36&page=1
>
> *** man, that web site right from the start proves its hostility to
> anything supernatural, yet with Egyptian artwork to boot.

What you meant to say was you don't like scholars who show your favorutie
fantasy is a load of hogwash in less than a minute.

That's usually the way with kooks.

Face it, your big lie got exposed. Everything else you present is just
nitpicking