Re: Another "Pole Shift"

From: Dr_Postman (Looky_at_mysig.foremail)
Date: 07/19/04 

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:48:51 GMT

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 02:06:26 GMT, Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com>
wrote:

>
>
>Dr_Postman wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:19:18 GMT, Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>DrPostman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
>>>>>wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
>>>>>polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
>>>>>during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
>>>>>for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
>>>>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
>>>>http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html
>>>
>>>My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
>>> Perhaps you should get some new glasses.
>>
>>
>> They weren't "near perfectly preserved" either. They don't even think
>> they can get what they need to try to clone them.
>
>You read about one (1) Mammoth discovery and now you think you know
>everything?

You made the claim. Where is this "near perfectly preserved" mammoth
you keep going on about?

>>>>>Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
>>>>>slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to a
>>>>>cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
>>>>of plates.
>
>I am not the one confused here, it is you.

Sure, pumpkin, you keep on believing that.

>>>
>>>No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
>>>I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
>>>the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
>>>land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.
>>
>>
>> The flipping of the magnetic fields will take several decades, if not
>> centuries. This will cause no earthquakes. The two are not related.
>
>Says who? You.....hahahahahahaha

Says science, troll.

>>>>
>>>>>mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
>>>>>earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
>>>>>and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
>>>>>reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
>>>>>polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new stellar
>>>>>alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core releasing
>>>>>massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
>>>>>confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.
>>>
>>>You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
>>>at the evidence which already does exist.
>>
>>
>> You are making some silly assumptions. I have looked at the
>> "evidence"
>
>What evidence did you look at? A silly attempt to clone Mammoths?
>Hhahahahahahaha

No, dumbass, that was your link.

>> and found it wanting, if not out right wrong. Care to refute the
>> following?
>> http://www.planet-x.150m.com/nopoleshift.html
>> http://www.pibburns.com/smmia5.htm
>
>You call those two web sites evidence? And then you have the nerve to
>say I support those web sites? Man you are a dumb ass.

Admission of failure to refute those web sites noted. You really
suck ass as a troll. Can't you come up with something better?

>>
>>>>On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
>>>>years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
>>>>in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.
>>>
>>>You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.
>>
>>
>> You are confused over what ice core samples can prove.
>
>Pfftt...why dont you just go away or hide in a corner. Stop telling me
>what I believe or do not believe. I can speak for myself. Idiot.

No, you can't, troll.

>> Educate yourself:
>
>While you are at...do the same. ANd take that dunce cap off, it makes
>you look bad.
>
>> http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/~ecoogan/ACSChicago_files/frame.htm
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icecores.html
>>

Afraid to look at those web sites?

>>>>>How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
>>>>>pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
>>>>>some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
>>>>>perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
>>>>>artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
>>>>>under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.
>>>
>>>You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.
>>
>>
>> Where is your proof that there are?
>
>
>Like you care. You already stated there is no proof or evidence of
>underwater structures... now you ask me where is the proof. You really
>like to pick fights dont you.

Bad troll trick, no donut for you.

>I saw the Han*** show, he
>> pointed out no pyramids. The data from the museum in Cuba that
>> backed the last expedition doesn't show any pyramids either (unless
>> I missed it in all the pics.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
>>>>web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,
>>>
>>>What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
>>>agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
>>>wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.
>>
>>
>> What I have researched seems to trump your ad hominems all to hell.
>
>It actually shows how much of a dumb arse you are..your socalled
>"research" isnt worth half of what my toilet paper is worth.

Because you say so, not because of ANY evidence you have even
attempted to put forward. A good troll would at least try to.

>>
>>> with
>>>
>>>>wave action proving how they were formed.
>
>There is no wave action of water that produces perfectly horizontal and
>vertical walls as yet in any scientific paper I have seen? Please show
>me the quotes which scientists who claims water erosion can make
>perfectly aligned vertical walls and horizontal steps? Please do show
>your incredible (sic) research?

Look below.

>>>How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
>>>that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
>>>nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.
>>
>>
>> Sure thing, ***:
>>
>> "The Japanese sites of Yonaguni and Kerama are natural rock, with no
>> sign of archaeological significance. Again, I informed Han***'s film
>> company in June 2000 that these sites were natural, and that there
>> were better sites to visit. This information was ignored, although all
>> the documents and reports on better sites are in the public domain
>> (see bibliography, below). The Japanese Nippon TV company showed me
>> video recordings of the Yonaguni site in about 1992 and I considered
>> it to obviously be natural rock, an opinion that was reported on
>> Japanese domestic television."
>> source: http://www.hallofmaat.com/maat/article.php?sid=36&page=1
>
>*** man, that web site right from the start proves its hostility to
>anything supernatural, yet with Egyptian artwork to boot. What a damn
>bunch of hypocrites you like to quote from. The article you are quoting
>only shows to me that they never saw the actual underwater sites...but
>merely viewed pictures of it online. Furthermore, they have yet to
>explain how water erosion can produce vertical walls in perfect
>alignment even after thousands of years under water. Put plainly its a
>web site devoted to sycophantic spin doctoring and hateful arse kissing
>propaganda. You'll have to do better than that.

As good as you are doing, even better.

>>
>>> Even the TV show
>>>
>>>>were Han*** tries to prove they are man made the geologist
>>>>with him says otherwise.
>
>Ok, so what. A geologist says otherwise...who cares. The facts speak

That's right, ignore the word of a scientists over a con artist.

>for themselves. In fact the discovery of the underwater monuments were
>predicted and the exact location to boot before their chance discovery.

Says who?

> And by the way....how come no one is saying anything about the
>Meditterenean underwater cities and structures? How did they end up
>underwater? And how come your geologist who relies upon water erosion
>to discount perfect vertical walls and perfect horizontal platforms
>under water....says nothing about the sphinx being subjected to water
>erosion at a much earlier time than is accepted by Egyptologists?

Cite?

>>>Just like you I suppose, you can prove that there is no such thing as
>>>sunken artifical cities.
>>
>>
>> I didn't post that, now did I, ***? I have scuba dived on one,
>> have you?
>
>Tsk, tsk..dumb arse. You just said there is no under water cities. ANd

Nice try, stupid troll. I didn't say anything of the sort.

>in this post you provided a link to a web site which says the platforms
>were made by water erosion, even though there is no proof to say
>that...you back it up like its the truth....so who is the dumb arse? You
>are.

Looks like you're the one stepping into your own troll ***.

>>
>>
>>
>>> The claim for Cuba is even more silly.
>>>
>>>Thats why National Geographic is doing a report on it, because of its
>>>silly factor.
>>
>>
>> No, the claims that are being made are silly because a LOT more data
>> is needed. More than one dive, and a closer one at that, is needed.
>> I bet you don't even know the extent of the first expedition, do you?
>
>How old are you? are you like 20ish going on like 9?

You really can do better than this.

>>
>>>>So far all they have done is find rocks that might be man
>>>>made, but a LOT of closer investigation is needed before
>>>>any conclusion can be reached.
>
>Blah, blah, blah, blah..thats not how you act in your first response.
>You said and I quote...there is no such thing as underwater structures
>that are man made.

No I didn't. You go ahead and show us the google reference, pumpkin.

Daymn boy, but you are so transparent.

>I did a quick search on frozen mammoths only to show that certain
>conditions are necessary for them to exist. But like the underwater
>monument finds all over the world, I figured dumb asses like you would
>say, there is no such thing as frozen Mammoths. So I provided a link.
>The actual find is quite specific however that I am referring to when i
>say...nearly perfectly preserved. Remember that is nearly...in case you
>miss that.

I'm still waiting for a reference to a "near perfectly preserved"
mammoth.

>*** man, you are and others in here are pretty darn stupid. This
>thread is all about polar shifting, but instead...its more all about
>"prove this Yoda, and prove that Yoda, and your stupid Yoda, and blah,
>blah blah" there is no serious interest here about what happens during
>a pole shift.
>
>>
>> And you even suck at the ad hominems, let alone backing up your
>> claims.
>
>*** you too.

Nawww, pumpkin, you fucked yourself. 

--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD;    "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com
"Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?"
  - Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how
     sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time.