Re: revisiting Apollo

From: Paul Lawler (stargazer_at_kilolaniDOT.net)
Date: 07/19/04 

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:46:33 GMT

"Jaxtraw" <jaxtraw@nospamnobigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:1090216924.9120.0@eunomia.uk.clara.net...
> "Paul Lawler" <stargazer@kilolaniDOT.net> wrote in message
> news:TCEKc.7738$Qu5.284@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > "Yoda" <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > news:BkDKc.1058410$Ar.541753@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> > > You're the moron to believe that picture which clearly shows moon mud
is
> > > dust. Dust doesnt leave footprints. And what museum has samples of
> > > this dust so that we can all view it and compare samples? Please you
> > > have to do better than that.
> >
> > And you are the person (you may, in fact be a moron, but I don't have
> enough
> > evidence to make the kind of judgements you seem to be able to make
> without
> > evidence) who doesn't seem to realize that very fine lunar dust might
have
> > different properties from the kind of dust that "doesn't leave
> footprints."
> > In fact, I would posit that most fine dust (e.g. flour) leaves very
clear
> > footprints.

> I performed a simple experiment yesterday evening using flour and a
> selection of simple objects, and confirmed that flour does indeed create
> very accurate prints of the objects impressed upon it. Sadly at this point
I
> got carried away, added some butter and sugar, and made an extremely fine
> fruit crumble. I have thus eaten the evidence for my claims, but am
prepared
> to go on Canadian TV and state what happened.

*gasp* How dare you do an actual experiment? You... you... you scientist
you! Don't you know that you can learn everything you need to know from the
Internet and the Givers of Light?

> Or provide the recipe.

Now you're talking!

Quantcast