Re: revisiting Apollo
From: Yoda (briansterling_at_rogers.com)
Date: 07/19/04
- Next message: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Previous message: Jay Windley: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- In reply to: EvolBob: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Next in thread: Jay Windley: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Jay Windley: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Benign Vanilla: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:16:33 GMT
EvolBob wrote:
>>...and one image of an astronaught on the moon and in the
>
> > viser what can clearly be seen is a studio lighting boom
The fake moon pictures really doesn't bother me. I work in marketing
and I managed to get a client who makes and designs molds for sneakers
and shoes. They are solely interested in the sole of the footwear and
not the overall design, so their major clientele are footwear
manufacturers. They needed some marketing proposals and I proposed the
'first footprint on the Moon' for their backdrop. If I really believed
that all the pictures were faked including the footprint, I would never
have recommended it. I merely like to take the opposite view and see
where that leads. And obviously it brings out the morons, idiots and
trolls like you who think they have found a new victim to put down.
Well your insults do not bother me one wit, not one. I am laughing my
ass off over all of this. I know that isn't very scientific of me, but
who cares, no one on this newsgroup has anything realistic to say other
than "you're wrong", or "you're a kook"....hahahhahahahhahah
Usenet is a joke.
>
> I think you are confused.
> That was a movie called 'Capricorn One'.
That movie sucks. Never seen it and have no intention of watching it ever.
>
>
> "Yoda" <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote in message news:wDEKc.1059358$Ar.538488@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
>
>>Tim listen, I have watched the documentary with interest along with my
>>wife.
I watched it with interest, but at the same time...the tone of the whole
documentary sounded too 'happy'...
She is not really interested though in space stuff. The
>>documentary says in very specific terms without 'hints' as you put it,
>>that the moon footage shown to the world as real was in fact hoaxed on
>>order by President Nixon and his aides, through the studios operated by
>>Stanley Kubrick. They also specifically zero in on the fluttering flag,
>>the footprint, and one image of an astronaught on the moon and in the
>>viser what can clearly be seen is a studio lighting boom. These are the
>>only images they describe as part of the hoax, including one other video
>>which was supposedly Neil Armstrong getting off the lander to make his
>>now famous remark.
>>
>>They didnt once say there were no moon landings, or missions. It was
>>all about the Nixon-Kubrick affair.
>>
>>Besides it really doesn't matter either way. It was done for political
>>reasons, nothing more and nothing less. If you and others can't simply
>>see that, then you doom the rest of the world along with you to remain
>>buffoons.
>>
>>
>>Tim Auton wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yoda <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Tim Auton wrote:
>>>
>>>[snip]
If anyone reads my responses all I did was quote the documentary.
Nothing more and nothing less.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 06/07/2004
>
>
- Next message: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Previous message: Jay Windley: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- In reply to: EvolBob: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Next in thread: Jay Windley: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Jay Windley: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Benign Vanilla: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|