Re: revisiting Apollo
From: Jay Windley (webmaster_at_clavius.org)
Date: 07/19/04
- Next message: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Previous message: Jaxtraw: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- In reply to: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Next in thread: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:30:07 -0600
"Yoda" <briansterling@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:l6VKc.684$yhj1.110@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
|
| Well your insults do not bother me one wit, not one. I am laughing my
| ass off over all of this.
As am I. It's always funny to see people bluster their way into an
argument, calling people names and referring vaguely to evidence, only to
have people more familiar with that evidence completely deconstruct the
argument. It's even more funny to see the original provacateurs try to
backpedal their way out of embarrassing gaffes by saying it was all just a
prank.
If all conspiracy theories were as ineptly argued as this one, there
wouldn't be any.
| no one on this newsgroup has anything realistic to say other
| than "you're wrong", or "you're a kook"....hahahhahahahhahah
Not true. You've been given a number of scientifically valid explanations
for why your arguments -- provocation or not -- do not stand. You have
consistently ignored them, preferring instead to follow the ad hominem
threads.
| Usenet is a joke.
Thanks in large measure to contributions such as yours.
| If anyone reads my responses all I did was quote the documentary.
| Nothing more and nothing less.
False. You asserted that the "documentary" was proof that the U.S.
government had recanted on its claim to have landed on the moon, and you
berated all of us for not believing its conclusions. You held this position
until it was conclusively demonstrated to you that *you* are the one who was
fooled. Now you're trying to backpedal and claim it was all just a
provocateur's prank and that you never put any stock in it in the first
place.
Trust me, you're quite transparent. You got burned, and now you're trying
to make it seem like we're the "real" victims here.
--
|
The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org
- Next message: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Previous message: Jaxtraw: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- In reply to: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Next in thread: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Reply: Yoda: "Re: revisiting Apollo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
