Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?
From: vonroach (hadrainc_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Previous message: vonroach: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:48:24 GMT
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:00:28 +0200, Bjoern Feuerbacher
<feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
>Fine. Then now answer my question above. I'll repeat it here for
>convenience:
>Care to explain why the results from the analysis of the supernova are
>not only internally consistent, but also consistent with other types of
>observations?
The observations you cite have little to do with supernovas of either
type. You say your views are consistent, I say you have misunderstood
the meaning of the terms. The observations are consistent when the
events are correctly understood.
But please get on with your understanding of the `big bang' event
where huge quantities of energy and matter appeared, in a chaotic
uncertain situation from an _undefined_ `point'. I like mysteries.
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Previous message: vonroach: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|