Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?
From: Creighton Hogg (wchogg_at_hep.wisc.edu)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: NJ: "lunar walks faked"
- Previous message: El Guapo: "Re: OK, LARRY KING, Time to Show Some Guts!"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:08:03 -0500
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
> vonroach wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:13:05 +0200, Bjoern Feuerbacher
> > <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>And yet again, you show that you don't understand the BB.
> >>
> >>The total energy of the universe is *zero*.
> >
> >
> > Huh?
>
> What's your problem with that statement?
Actually, I'm a little confused about what you mean, Bjoern. If the total
energy in the universe is zero, it's pretty obvious that everything around
us has energy, so what's the negative component that cancels all that out.
Maybe I'm just being dense, but I'm not thinking of the answer at the
moment.
- Next message: NJ: "lunar walks faked"
- Previous message: El Guapo: "Re: OK, LARRY KING, Time to Show Some Guts!"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|