Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error.
From: Paul Cardinale (pcardinale_at_volcanomail.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-)"
- Previous message: Nathan Jones: "The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-)"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jul 2004 06:49:37 -0700
"Androcles" <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:<nnvNc.9333$N11.93790419@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@aurigae.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in
> message news:7e3it1-0ch.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net...
> | In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse
> | <fseggNOSPAM@uaf.edu>
> | wrote
> | on Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:08:36 -0800
> | <8r6cg0d8vjukalqpaa0qng56hn87dklcrj@4ax.com>:
> | > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:20:19 GMT, Robert <RB@..> wrote:
> | >
> | > [snip]
> | >
> | > Another name change? Aww Henri has to run from the filters.
> | >
> | > Hey Henri, whats (-1) * (-1)?
> |
> | You mean to say he's got the same problem as Spaceman in that
> | respect?
> |
> | Ye gods. One can question SR based on various issues that
> | do not square with (perceived) reality (and then do some
> | research), but basic math?!
>
> Yes, basic math.
>
> By 'v' we mean dx/dt. It's simple enough, a small change in distance
> divided by a small change in time.
> When we multiply dx/dt by dt, we get ... yep, dx. Letting d = 1, v = x/t.
d isn't a variable dorko, you can't assign it a value. If you had
bothered to learn ANYTHING at all about calculus, you would know that
v = dx/dt does NOT imply that v = x/t. It's amazing that someone who
is repeatedly publicly shown to be mathematically incompetant
continues to try to use math publicly.
Paul Cardinale
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-)"
- Previous message: Nathan Jones: "The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-)"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
