Re: Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star, How I Wonder Where You Are (Forwarded)
From: Jim Greenfield (greenfield_7_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Previous message: Mike Schwab: "Re: Help! Urgent Astronomy Request"
- In reply to: Andrew Yee: "Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star, How I Wonder Where You Are (Forwarded)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 5 Aug 2004 20:33:30 -0700
Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:<dAgQc.35619$Vm1.786884@news20.bellglobal.com>...
> University Relations
> Pennsylvania State University
>
> Contacts:
> A'ndrea Elyse Messer, (814) 865-9481, aem1@psu.edu
> Vicki Fong, (814) 865-9481, vfong@psu.edu
>
> August 4, 2004
>
> Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star, How I Wonder Where You Are
>
> University Park, Pa. -- Whether viewed dimly through the haze and lights of a
> city or in all their glory in a pristine wilderness, the stars that surround the
> Earth are magnificent, and one day Earthlings will travel to some of the new
> planets that astronomers are locating. However, the stars we see are not
> necessarily where we think they are, according to an international research team.
>
> "We know that the light from distant stars takes a very long time to reach the
> Earth," says Dr. Akhlesh Lakhtakia, distinguished professor of engineering
> science and mechanics, Penn State. "But, taking into account the distance a star
> will have moved while that light travels, we still may not be able to accurately
> locate the star."
>
> Negative phase velocity media or materials with negative refractive index may be
> responsible for this locational uncertainty. Recently, materials researchers at
> the University of California San Diego, working with micro and nano materials,
> developed a metamaterial that had a negative refractive index for microwaves,
> proving that negative phase materials could exist at least in the microwave part
> of the electromagnetic spectrum. Their requirements for this material were that
> both the relative permittivity, a measure of the charge separation in a
> material, and the relative permeability, a measure of how electrons loop in
> materials, of a substance must be less than zero.
>
> While the implications for negative phase velocity media in the nano world are
> the creation of a perfect lens, a lens with no distortion with applications for
> optical transmission devices, CDs, DVDs, microwave systems, etc., in the
> universe at large, these media can disguise the location of a star, according to
> the researchers.
>
> A material with negative index of refraction transmits light or other wave
> energy differently than one with positive index of refraction. In all natural
> materials, when an energy beam -- light, radar, microwave -- passes through
> water or glass or some other material, the beam is displaced in the same
> direction. The amount of displacement depends upon how much the material slows
> the speed of the beam. In negative phase velocity media, the displacement is in
> the opposite direction.
>
> Lakhtakia and Tom. G. Mackay, lecturer in Mathematics, University of Edinburgh
> decided to look at why the permittivity and permeability had to be less than
> zero. They found that one or both permeability and permittivity could be less
> than zero and negative phase velocity would occur. They then found that both
> could be greater than zero and a negative index of refraction would occur but
> only when special relativity came into play.
>
> The researchers looked at transmission through space, where high velocities are
> common.
>
> "First I did the derivations with the observer moving and the energy source
> stationary," says Lakhtakia. " Then Mackay did the derivations with the observer
> stationary and the light source moving."
>
> What they found was that it depends on the state of the observer whether any
> particular media at any time has negative or positive index of refraction. The
> relative velocity of the observer changes the index of any material.
More likely the result of c'=c+v as the space "medium" is so
rareified as to have little (no) effect
>
> "Light coming off a stellar object passes through many different regions of
> space filled with different media and is affected by different gravitational
> fields," says Lakhtakia. "When we finally see it, we cannot really know where it
> originated."
Yes. If the light bringing the information has been subject to changes
of speed (refractive index/direction) and velocity per gravity
(speed/direction), nothing we see at distance may be where it seems,
or EVER was.
>
> While this may be of no consequence today, Lakhtakia believes it has important
> implications for when space travel is common. Because this is a direction
> dependent effect, it will change the telemetry of objects and spacecraft.
What!!?? EVERY observation ever made of distant objects/events, and
the theories developed from that data, become very suspect (faulty)
>
> "The business of space navigation and interpreting star maps could be a lot more
> complicated than we now think it is," says Lakhtakia. "Imagine mining of
> extrasolar asteroids. We might not want to send humans to do the mining, but
> robots would have to know where the asteroid is and where on its surface to mine
> when it left our solar system."
>
> Calculations would need to be made from Earth on an asteroid that might not be
> where we visually see it. The effects of negative phase velocity media would
> need to be taken into consideration.
It'll be a bugger if they don't take enough fuel, because the target
is further away than first thought!
Jim G
>
> Another problem would be navigating from somewhere far away from the Earth in a
> space ship using information gathered from the Earth. Depending on the velocity
> of the spacecraft and the object aimed for, negative phase velocity media
> between the spacecraft and the destination would also need to be considered.
>
> **aem**
>
> EDITORS: Dr. Lakhtakia is at 814-863-4319 or akhlesh@psu.edu by email.
- Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Previous message: Mike Schwab: "Re: Help! Urgent Astronomy Request"
- In reply to: Andrew Yee: "Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star, How I Wonder Where You Are (Forwarded)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|