Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate
From: Harvey Rutt (xh.ruttx_at_x.ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: 08/09/04
- Next message: Marcel Luttgens: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Previous message: Sander Vesik: "Re: Musings on Nasa and the Concept of Truth."
- In reply to: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Next in thread: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Reply: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:58:58 +0100
"Ralph Sansbury" <r9ns@bestweb.net> wrote in message
news:e988316b.0408060658.670c1f2b@posting.google.com...
> Skywise <into@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote in message
news:<VV%Pc.8765$9Y6.1536@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
>
> > > every where you turn people[who play fast and loose with supposed
facts] are pointing you towards facts
> > that prove you to be wrong.
>
> The scrutinized facts are 1) there are no clear measurements of
> light speed delay beyond a so that the premise light speed does not
> extrapolate beyond a second ........................
Really?
There are direct optical measurements of Lidar returns from the moon, &
thats more than a second, and radar returns from Venus (And Mars?) which is
far more.
But of course there will be pages of verbiage (but no formulae) explaining
why that doesnt matter...............
Harvey
(back in circulation after major, but successful surgery, if anyone has
noticed my absence!)
- Next message: Marcel Luttgens: "Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?"
- Previous message: Sander Vesik: "Re: Musings on Nasa and the Concept of Truth."
- In reply to: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Next in thread: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Reply: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|