Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate

From: Ralph Sansbury (r9ns_at_bestweb.net)
Date: 08/09/04 

Date: 9 Aug 2004 07:42:40 -0700

"Harvey Rutt" <xh.ruttx@x.ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote in message news:<411758f7@news.ecs.soton.ac.uk>...
> "Ralph Sansbury" <r9ns@bestweb.net> wrote in message
> news:e988316b.0408060658.670c1f2b@posting.google.com...
> > Skywise <into@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote in message
> news:<VV%Pc.8765$9Y6.1536@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> >
> > > > every where you turn people[who play fast and loose with supposed
> facts] are pointing you towards facts
> > > that prove you to be wrong.
> >
> > The scrutinized facts are 1) there are no clear measurements of
> > light speed delay beyond a so that the premise light speed does not
> > extrapolate beyond a second ........................
>
> Really?
> There are direct optical measurements of Lidar returns from the moon, &
> thats more than a second, and radar returns from Venus (And Mars?) which is
> far more.
> But of course there will be pages of verbiage (but no formulae) explaining
> why that doesnt matter...............
>
>

  Good to hear you are feeling better.
 What are the formulae for the errors in the lidar and radar
reflections? The references and discussion on my web page show they
are large. That is some of the moon reflections are from secondary
scattering etc and the radar reflections from Venus etc supposedly
showing different surface heights for different pixels of the image
have larger error bars so that they are indistinguishable from noise.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesnt Extrapolate
    ... > facts] are pointing you towards facts ... What are the formulae for the errors in the lidar and radar ... That is some of the moon reflections are from secondary ... have larger error bars so that they are indistinguishable from noise. ...
    (sci.optics)
  • Re: The Quantum Activist
    ... measurements and the accepted theories of gravity. ... receipt of new facts. ... No one knows the entire radar in detail. ... cellphones work. ...
    (rec.music.classical.guitar)
  • Re: Re: No Absolute Bible Refutation
    ... An obscurantist ignores facts. ... radar" was not operated by a competent person, ... Ron Wyatt did eventually get the necessary training, ... Real scientists don't fudge their data to fit preconcived notions. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: how to make objects invisible.
    ... These do not make aircraft truly 'invisible' to radar, only greatly reduce their detection range. ... One problem is that even a transparent material which has an index of refraction greater than air still creates some reflections at the air/solid interface. ... So even if an object is truly transparent, you will see some reflection and background refraction, especially in strong sunlight. ... Truly strong absorbers as used in radar do NOT work, as the result is you see a flat black object standing out against a visible background. ...
    (sci.electronics.misc)
  • Re: Are there asteroids between the sun and mercury?
    ... rc> that's how they found the actual rotation rate of Mercury. ... but there's a difference between using radar to image an object ... are reflected if they are below the plasma frequency. ... He indeed did see reflections, ...
    (sci.physics)