Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error.
From: Paul B. Andersen (paul.b.andersen_at_hia.no)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Ron: "Out From the Shadows: Two New Saturnian Moons"
- Previous message: Paul Lawler: "Re: Error-prone Danish astronomer..."
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:25:20 +0200
"Henri Wilson" <h@..> skrev i melding news:mb50i01q403nu6kkbteounvjljvkp2s4f8@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:24:26 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@hia.no>
> wrote:
>
> >"vonroach" <hadrainc@earthlink.net> skrev i melding news:toflh05r4kgt3b5udi2p69gc6ub6af7noe@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:20:08 GMT, h@..(Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >>
> >> >See proof that light speed is source dependent.
> >>
> >> Why should I waste time on that?
> >
> >The funny thing is that Henri Wilson's program
> >www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe
> >proves that light speed is NOT source dependent.
> >
> >If we apply the program on binaries with known data,
> >the program shows that the ballistic theory predicts
> >that the binary should be observed to be very different
> >from what it actually is.
> >For example will the program predict that the binaries
> >BF Lyn and 57 Cyg should be variables.
> >But they are not.
>
> How do you know they are not.
> Have you viewed them from anywhere other than planet Earth?
Was THAT the best you can do? :-)
I note with interest that you do not deny that
the ballistic theory predicts that these binaries
should be variables.
> >So Henri's program prove that the predictions of
> >the ballistic theory is false, and thus falsifies the theory.
>
> The theory cannot be false.
> ...unless you want to accept that an absolute 'aether' exists.
>
> How do you explain why light from differently moving sources should ever travel
> at the same speed through the vacuum of space?
The predictions of the theory are wrong,
but "the theory cannot be false".
Henri Wilson in a nutshell.
Paul
- Next message: Ron: "Out From the Shadows: Two New Saturnian Moons"
- Previous message: Paul Lawler: "Re: Error-prone Danish astronomer..."
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
