Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?
From: Eric Flesch (eric_at_flesch.org)
Date: 08/24/04
- Next message: Carmen L. Abruzzi: "Re: Evolution is really sun worship"
- Previous message: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: The Hubble Should SPLASH!"
- In reply to: Jim Greenfield: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Next in thread: vonroach: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Reply: vonroach: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 05:46:06 GMT
On 23 Aug 2004 17:36:06 -0700, greenfield_7@hotmail.com (Jim
Greenfield) wrote:
>As for the gravitational effect on the velocity of a photon, that is
>seen routinely when a star passes behind the sun- the path of the
>photon is changed by the sun's gravity (per Newton)
You're confusing topics; we were discussing "in-flight" photons
*exerting* gravity.
>> In that sense you are right. But I am reminded of one of Bohr's
>> refutations of Einstein's gedankenexperimenten where Einstein's
>> premise of increased mass was countered by the different rates of time
>> flow in a differential gravitational field. I suspect the same
>> applies here. In any event, this does not show that the "in-flight"
>> photon exerts gravitation.
>
>This would suggest, that for EMR, gravity is a one way street: the sun
>exerts an influence on passing photons, but you claim that they do not
>reciprocate---
>highly unlikely
Why, because you say so?
Eric
- Next message: Carmen L. Abruzzi: "Re: Evolution is really sun worship"
- Previous message: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: The Hubble Should SPLASH!"
- In reply to: Jim Greenfield: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Next in thread: vonroach: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Reply: vonroach: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|