Re: digest 2453240

From: Michael Lockhart (ml1000_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 09/01/04 

Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:36:56 -0400

<tholen@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:11hZc.17067$Bt5.4812@twister.socal.rr.com...
> Michael Lockhart writes:
>>> Alex writes:
>>>>> grantco writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lockhart?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> love....
>
>> <snip remainder>
>
> Figures.

Yes, it is reasonable to snip the rest of that discussion, as I had nothing
to do with it.

>> Wow. I'm amazed how many responses your moronic nonresponses to my post
>> engendered.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I posted "moronic nonresponses",
> Lockhart.

Hardly.

> But that's rather ironic, coming from someone who hasn't
> yet answered my question about what his questions have to do with
> classical music.

Indeed, it is ironic for you to mention that, as you still haven't answered
my question, which I asked you first.

>> Again, I ask you: why have you apparently ceased your
>> digestification and gone back to individual replies?
>
> Again I ask what your question has to do with classical music, Lockhart.

Again, I ask you: why have you apparently ceased your digestification and
gone back to individual replies? I asked you first, and your question will
not be answered until mine is.

Michael

Relevant Pages

  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... > Michael Lockhart writes: ... apparently ceased you digestification and gone back to individual replies? ... Your posts continually substantiate that fact. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... > Michael Lockhart writes: ... > What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart? ... >> going to reply to all the posts you considered antagonistic in your ... >> thought it was someone pretending to be you, but on closer inspection, it ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... > Michael Lockhart writes: ... >> As you, yourself, continually say, this is a new iteration of the ... Lockhart. ... >> digestification and gone back to individual replies? ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... Michael Lockhart writes: ... That despite having previously stated that I deserve no more ... > gone back to individual replies? ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... "Michael Lockhart" wrote: ... >ironic) complaining and return to the matter at hand: ... >apparently ceased you digestification and gone back to individual replies? ... snipping was quite appropriate. ...
    (sci.astro)