Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?
From: Jim Greenfield (greenfield_7_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/09/04
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: chances are greater of this being alien contact than not; signal in Pisces and Aries"
- Previous message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: NASA Gravity Probe B mission enters science phase, ready to test Einstein's theory (Forwarded)"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Sep 2004 22:57:06 -0700
"Androcles" <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:<i49_c.88$684.867493@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> "Jim Greenfield" <greenfield_7@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3c4afb26.0409031708.434e380a@posting.google.com...
> | vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:<8qcfj0p9k5k6onqgfa7i3ikeqdfjd8u6cp@4ax.com>...
> | > On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:17:08 GMT, "Androcles"
> | > <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> | >
> | > >
> | > >"Jim Greenfield" <greenfield_7@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> | > >news:3c4afb26.0409011302.2727a6b7@posting.google.com...
> | > >| "Androcles" <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<fVkZc.829$GY5.9693391@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> | > >| > "RP" <no_mail_no_spam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> | > >| > news:2plqglFmmtlkU1@uni-berlin.de...
> | > >| > |
> | > >| > |
> | > >| > | Jim Greenfield wrote:
Androcles.
> | > >
> | > Einstein warned: "Most mistakes in philosophy and logic occur because
> | > the human mind is apt to take the symbol for reality"
> |
> | So the idiot, seeing that the stove was red hot, went ahead and put
> | his hand on it anyway!.........leading to the premise of shrinkage,
> | time warp etc
> |
> | (-) is a SYMBOL. Yet Einstein (et al) STILL went ahead and considered
> | "less than zeros" as "REALITY"
> |
> | Jim G
> | c'=c+v
>
> Here's another. 0.
> It is a very useful symbol for show how far a quantity is displaced from
> the decimal point, but it represents nothing and has all the properties of
> nothing, which are none at all. You can multiply by it, and say there are
> 0*6 apples in the barrel, just as there are 0*Jims in the barrel either. You
> can divide by it and get any quantity you like, but you can add it or
> subtract it.
> It is the empty set, it is vacuum. It cannot be, for it is nothing. It is an
> idea, and an idea is like unto a computer program. It is not real, in the
> sense that we can reach out and touch it, it has no substance. It is the
> symbol.
> Androcles
Have a look at how your computer works. There are a series of 0,1 ,
or (+1) if you like. There are NO (-1)s, because there are NO minus
ones in nature. For those who "believe" that "imaginary" has the same
kudos as "natural" and "real", arguing against them is futile. It is
akin to arguing against the existence of ghosts, to somebody who has
"seen" one!!!!!
Jim G
c'=c+v
>
>
> | > Tell me Andy, does it seem strange to you that all matter and energy
> | > has been described as particular (quantum theory). And that the mind's
> | > contribution of a spacetime in which this process lives is a continum
> | > (unless you agree to Planck time, planck length, etc?)
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: chances are greater of this being alien contact than not; signal in Pisces and Aries"
- Previous message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: NASA Gravity Probe B mission enters science phase, ready to test Einstein's theory (Forwarded)"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
