Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 09/26/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:22:37 +0200

George Dishman wrote:
[snip]

> If the correct formula is sqrt(fR * fS), then obviously
> fS would be wrong because it is different. If you had
> showed that fS was correct, then SR would be wrong, but
> you showed fS was wrong - you got your logic the wrong
> way round as well.

He thinks that by showing that the SR formula can be written
as sqrt(fR * fS), where fR and fS are the formulas for *sound*,
not for light, he has shown that the SR formula can't be valid
for light.

And he really thinks that that is a logical argument.

What can one do in the sight of such utter nonsense? Apparently
he is totally impervious to math and logic.

[snip]

Bye,
Bjoern

Relevant Pages
Loading