Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 10/01/04 

Date: 1 Oct 2004 00:02:51 -0700

tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<9A_6d.1047$z04.956@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> grantco writes:
>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, this is the same person who claimed that he was going to leave the
> >>>>>>>> newsgroup because he found it so depressing. After another 116 postings
> >>>>>>>> in the newsgroup, he decided it was time to drag me into his little world
> >>>>>>>> again, making a fool of himself in the process.
>
> >>>>>>> Well, at least he's not alone, Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> Well, I see that you've turned to stalking, grantco. That makes you
> >>>>>> a fool to go with Bass.
>
> >>>>> Define "stalking" Tholen.
>
> >>>> Unnecessary, given that the dictionary has already done so, grantco.
>
> >>> Perhaps you should look it up then, Tholen.
>
> >> Perhaps not, grantco.
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> Obviously you knoweth not of what you speak...
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>>>> If you do not want your petty bickerings
> >>>>> commented upon, perhaps the wiser plan would be not to write them?
>
> >>>> Non sequitur, given that I said nothing about the occurrence of
> >>>> your comments, grantco., but you are erroneously presupposing the
> >>>> existence of some "petty bickerings" from me.
>
> >>> ALL your posts are petty bickering, Tholen...
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>>>>>> Now you won't need to feel you are the ONLY fool around here,
> >>>>>>> Tholen....
>
> >>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> >>>>>> argument. Getting pretty desperate, grantco, following me around
> >>>>>> to other newsgroups.
>
> >>>>> This was posted in rec.music.classical, numb nuts.
>
> >>>> Liar:
> >>>>
> >>>> ] From: grantco@greenbaynet.com (grantco)
> >>>> ] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
> >>>> ] Subject: Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
> >>>> ] Date: 24 Sep 2004 11:32:39 -0700
> >>>> ] Message-ID: <b51015e1.0409241032.67f91613@posting.google.com
>
> >> Note: no response.
>
> > No response necessary.
>
> Classic rationalization of your evasion, grantco.
>
> >>>>> I didn't put it here.
>
> >>>> Liar:
> >>>>
> >>>> ] From: grantco@greenbaynet.com (grantco)
> >>>> ] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
> >>>> ] Subject: Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
> >>>> ] Date: 24 Sep 2004 11:32:39 -0700
> >>>> ] Message-ID: <b51015e1.0409241032.67f91613@posting.google.com
>
> >>> Yup.
>
> >> Glad to see you admit to being a liar, grantco.
>
> > Ah, there's that playground logic again...
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of "playground logic". Rather
> ironic, coming from someone pretending that he's posting in a
> different newsgroup.
>
> >>> In rec.music.classical it shows that this thread and the
> >>> following posts are going into comp.os.os2.advocacy BUT they are
> >>> listed and posted at rec.music.classical.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> Perhaps if you weren't too
> >>> LAZY to look for yourself you'd know that before making empty
> >>> accusations.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> > Go to google.
>
> Unnecessary, grantco.
>
> > Go to groups.
>
> Unnecessary, grantco.
>
> > Go to rec.music.classical.
>
> Unnecessary, grantco.
>
> > Its there.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > If this is too much for you to do, then you are LAZY.
>
> How ironic, coming from the person too lazy to present any header.
> Meanwhile, I presented a header above, demonstrating that you're
> posting only to comp.os.os2.advocacy, grantco.
>
> >>> You flatter yourself by thinking I'd actually BOTHER to look for your
> >>> posts to comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>
> >> You're erroneously presupposing that it is necessary to think, grantco.
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> This thread is appearing in rec.music.classical.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> At least it does if you are reading rec.music.classical through
> >>> google.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > No need to substantiate.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Look for yourself.
>
> Unnecessary, grantco.
>
> > Its very simple, Tholen. Even YOU could figure it out.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I didn't figure out that you've
> been stalking me as soon as I saw your first posting show up in
> solely in comp.os.os2.advocacy, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from
> someone who still hasn't figured it out.
>
> >>>>> Obviously you don't even know where you are writing any more...
>
> >>>> Non sequitur, given that I was not referring to what I wrote, but rather
> >>>> what you wrote, grantco.
>
> >>> Completely relevant, numb nutz. What you are writing in this thread IS
> >>> for a FACT appearing in rec.music.classical.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> I didn't bring it there.
>
> >> You're erroneously presupposing that it's appearing there, grantco.
>
> > It is.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Simple as that, Tholen...
>
> On what basis do you call it simple, grantco? You still haven't
> figured it out.
>
> >>> Again, obviously you don't even know WHERE you are writing anymore.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
> >> from someone who doesn't know where he's writing.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Of course I know you will be too lazy to disprove my claim...
>
> >> You're the one who made the claim, grantco, therefore the burden of
> >> proof falls on your shoulders, not mine.
>
> > All that you wrote above is completely BOGUS, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > This thread,
> > your post and mine are ALL appearing at rec.music.progressive.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Interesting change in
> your claim, however.

I banged me gavel. I did me 'silence in court' bit. Ooh! If looks could kill
that prosecuting counsel would be in for thirty years, bruce.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
    ... > Note: no response. ... > Classic rationalization of your evasion, grantco. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ... > posting only to comp.os.os2.advocacy, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... > Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco. ... The facts state otherwise, Tholen. ... > Note: no response. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... > Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco. ... The facts state otherwise, Tholen. ... > Note: no response. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
    ... > A question is a response, grantco. ... > Irrelevant, grantco, given that I never said it wasn't a response. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ... > Or rec.music.progressive, for that matter. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: digest 2453240
    ... >>The facts state otherwise, Tholen. ... > Where do the facts allegedly state that I see a similarity to ... > Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco? ... >>Yes, your response is, Tholen. ...
    (sci.astro)