Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?
From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 10/02/04
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Bruce"
- Previous message: nan: "Re: DrPostman new statement !"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- Next in thread: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- Reply: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Oct 2004 02:29:53 -0700
rsteiner@visi.com (Richard Steiner) wrote in message news:<BghXBpHpvKcO092yn@visi.com>...
> Here in comp.os.os2.advocacy, tholen@antispam.ham spake unto us, saying:
>
> >If you had practiced what you preach, Steiner, your "Splunge!" response
> >to Bruce would not have shown up in rec.music.classical.
>
> I have *never* advocated the boycott of classical music froups. Never!
Hand over your lupins.
>
> Besides, mate, the wattle is the emblem of our land. You can stick it
> in a bottle, you can hold it in your hand. Amen!
Look, my fine friends. I happen to know that this is the Lupin Express.
>
> What are you? A prootwaddle??? :-) :-)
Wait a tic ... blimey, this redistribution of wealth is trickier than I thought.
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Bruce"
- Previous message: nan: "Re: DrPostman new statement !"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- Next in thread: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- Reply: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]