Re: digest 2453286

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 10/08/04 

Date: 7 Oct 2004 21:17:56 -0700

bruce aka tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<uvh9d.773$nl4.225@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> Cypherpunk writes:
>
> 792> And Tholokook is all three rolled inta one.
>
> 792> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
>
> 792> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> 792> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> 792> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks! Kerry sux!
>
> 792> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
>
> 793> I don't know what's funnier - all the bots chasin' Tholoputz or the
> 793> bots responding to each other as well. All we need now is Mark V. Shaney
> 793> to start tying things up with his posts.
>
> 793> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
>
> 793> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> 793> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> 793> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks! Kerry sux!
>
> 793> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
>
> 794> What youz understand is irrelevant, kook.
>
> 794> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
>
> 794> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> 794> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> 794> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks! Kerry sux!
>
> 794> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
>
> 795> LOL!!! Yer jokin' right? He's an OS/2 user. They haven't got a clue
> 795> at da best o times. Just lookat Tholen, fer example.
>
> 795> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
>
> 795> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> 795> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> 795> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks! Kerry sux!
>
> 795> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
>
> What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
> Cypherpunk?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
>
> 175> Tschaikowsky, bruce.
>
> 175> what does this have to do with bruce, bruce?
>
> 176> He never got drunk at night or bought home black puddings?
>
> 176> Well, if I may...I think the interesting thing here is the big swing to the
> 176> Silly Party and of course the very large swing back to the Sensible Party...
> 176> and a tendency to wobble up and down in the middle because the screw's loose.
>
> 177> He never got drunk at night or bought home black puddings?
>
> 177> Well, if I may...I think the interesting thing here is the big swing to the
> 177> Silly Party and of course the very large swing back to the Sensible Party...
> 177> and a tendency to wobble up and down in the middle because the screw's loose.
>
> 178> Fine. I'm the head waiter. This is a vegetarian restaurant only, we serve no
> 178> animal flesh of any kind. We're not only proud of that, we're smug about it.
> 178> So if you were to come in here asking me to rip open a small defenseless
> 178> chicken, so you could chew its skin and eat its intestines, then I'm afraid
> 178> I'd have to ask you to leave.
>
> 178> Likewise if you were to ask us to slice the sides of a cow and serve it with
> 178> small pieces of its liver or indeed drain the life blood from a pig before
> 178> cutting off one of its legs or carve the living giblets from a sheep and
> 178> serve them with the fresh brains, bowels, guts and spleen of a small rabbit
> 178> WE WOULDN'T DO IT. Not for food anyway.
>
> 179> Well it doesn't matter, anyway. I can hit it seven times out of ten, that's
> 179> the point.
>
> 180> Well now we're getting somewhere. No, wait. A new angle! In the snow, instead
> 180> of the tree, I see Rock Hudson, and instead of the dog I see Doris Day and,
> 180> gentlemen, Doris Day goes up to Rock Hudson and she kisses him. A love story.
> 180> Intercourse Italian style. David Hemmings as a hippy Gestapo officer. Frontal
> 180> nudity. A family picture. A comedy. And then when Doris Day's kissed Rock
> 180> Hudson she says something funny like...
>
> 180> Doris Day's a comedienne, not a newsreader. Get out!
> 180> She says something funny like ...
>
> 180> That's the stupidest idea I ever heard. Get out!
>
> 181> So all three of you think splunge, huh?
>
> 182> No, that figures. It was pretty predictable, really. It was an act of the purest
> 182> optimism to have posed the question in the first place. Tell me something, do
> 182> you have any cheese at all?
>
> 183> Now, I've noticed a tendency for this programme to get rather silly. Now I do
> 183> my best to keep things moving along, but I'm not having things getting silly.
> 183> Those two last sketches I did got very silly indeed, and that last one about
> 183> the bed was even sillier. Now, nobody likes a good laugh more than I do...
> 183> except perhaps my wife and some of her friends...oh yes and Captain Johnston.
> 183> Come to think of it most people likes a good laugh more than I do. But that's
> 183> beside the point. Now, let's have a good clean healthy outdoor sketch. Get
> 183> some air into your lungs. Ten, nine, eight and all that.
>
> 184> What flavour is it, bruce?
>
> 185> Shut your beak. Gott in Himmel... I never get any peace here.
>
> 186> Stuff the jam spoon, bruce!
>
> 187> THE BBC WOULD LIKE TO DENY THE LAST APOLOGY. IT IS VERY HAPPY AT HOME AND
> 187> BBC 2 IS BOUND TO GO THROUGH THIS PHASE, SO FROM ALL OF US HERE GOOD NIGHT,
> 187> SLEEP WELL, AND HAVE AN ABSOLUTELY SUPER DAY TOMORROW, KISS, KISS.
>
> 187> Ohhhh we used to DREAM of livin' in a corridor! Woulda' been a palace to us.
> 187> We used to live in an old water tank on a rubbish tip. We got woken up every
> 187> morning by having a load of rotting fish dumped all over us! House!? Hmph.
>
> 188> Right, cut to me. As Officer Commanding the Regular Army's Advertising Division,
> 188> I object, in the strongest possible terms to this obvious reference to our own
> 188> slogan 'It's a dog's life...er, a man's life in the modern army' and I warn
> 188> this programme that any recurrence of this sloppy long-haired civilian
> 188> plagiarism will be dealt with most severely. Right, now on the command 'cut',
> 188> the camera will cut to camera two, all right, director... Wait for it!
> 188> Camera cut.
>
> 189> And we apologize to viewers of 'Njorl's Saga' who may be confused by some
> 189> of the references to North Malden. After a frank exchange of views we have
> 189> agreed to carry on showing this version supplied to us by the North Malden
> 189> Icelandic Saga Society on the undertaking that future scenes will adhere
> 189> more closely to the spirit of twelfth-century Iceland.
>
> 190> That's all right sir, we get all sorts of lines in here. The head waiter will
> 190> be along to abuse you in a few moments, and now if you'll excuse me I have to
> 190> go and commit suicide.
>
> 190> Oh, blimey. You'd think he was awake all the night, scrabbling down by the
> 190> wainscotting.
>
> 191> Good. Because I don't want to disturb you. Specially as you're being so kind
> 191> about me not disturbing you.
>
> 192> Yes, I'm interested in shouting all right, by jove you certainly hit the nail
> 192> on the head with that particular observation of yours then.
>
> 192> Well, first of all become a doctor and discover a marvellous cure for something,
> 192> and then, when the medical profession really starts to take notice of you, you
> 192> can jolly well tell them what to do and make sure they get everything right so
> 192> there'll never be any diseases ever again.
>
> 193> In Norge we hatta svinska offikiose buinni a gogik in Europa.
>
> 193> Don't call me seņor! I'm not a Spanish person. You must call me Mr Biggles, or
> 193> Group Captain Biggles or Mary Biggles if I'm dressed as my wife, but never seņor.
>
> 194> Yes, I am. Yes. Yes, very very rich. Quite phenomenally wealthy. Yes, I do own
> 194> the most startling quantifies of cash. Yes, quite right... you're rather a smart
> 194> young lad aren't you. We could do with somebody like you to feed the pantomime
> 194> horse. Very smart.
>
> 194> No, no. I'd like to answer this question if I may in two ways. Firstly in my
> 194> normal voice and then in a kind of silly high-pitched whine... You see housing
> 194> is a problem really...
>
> 194> Splunge?
>
> 195> I like that! I like that, I can't take it any more, and then Rock Hudson says
> 195> 'I'm a very rich film producer and I need a lobotomy' and then Doris Dog says
> 195> 'I think you're very handsome and I'm going to take all my clothes off' and
> 195> then Doris Dog turns into a yak and goes to the bathroom on David Lemming.
> 195> No, wait, wait!
>
> 196> Ah! Hein...Reginald you have the wrong map here you silly old leg-before-wicket
> 196> English person.
>
> 197> Hello! It's funny how one can go through life, as I have, disliking bananas
> 197> and being indifferent to cheese, and then be able to eat, and enjoy, a banana
> 197> and cheese sandwich like this.
>
> 198> Oh, just a squeeze.
>
> 198> There is nothing quite as wonderful as money,
> 198> There is nothing quite as beautiful as cash,
> 198> Some people say it's folly
> 198> But I'd rather have the lolly
> 198> With money you can make a smash.
>
> 199> Well it's thirteen minutes to the hour of nine-nine-nine, here on wonderful
> 199> Radio One-One-One! So if you're still lying in your big big bed, now is the
> 199> time to get up out of it! We've got another thirteen hours of tip-top sounds
> 199> here on Wonderful Radio One! Sorry about that ... So unless you have brain
> 199> cells, or have completed the process of evolution, there's a wonderful day
> 199> ahead!
>
> 199> Yes. The Mouse Problem. This week 'The World Around Us' looks at the growing
> 199> social phenomenon of Mice and Men. What makes a man want to be a mouse.
>
> 200> Contempt of court. However, I'm not going to punish you, because we're so short
> 200> of judges at the moment, what with all of them emigrating to South Africa. I'm
> 200> going tomorrow; I've got my ticket. Get out there and get some decent sentencing
> 200> done. Ooh, England makes you sick. Best I can manage here is life imprisonment.
> 200> It's hardly worth coming in in the morning. Now, South Africa? You've got your
> 200> cat of nine tails, you've got four death sentences a week, you've got cheap
> 200> drinks, slave labour and a booming stock market. I'm off, I tell you. Yes, I'm
> 200> up to here with probation and bleeding psychiatric reports. That's it, I'm off.
> 200> That's it. Right. But I'm going to have one final fling before I leave, so I
> 200> sentence you to be burnt at the stake.
>
> 201> Hm. I see. Well I think I may be able to help you. You see your cat is suffering
> 201> from what we Vets haven't found a word for. His condition is typified by total
> 201> physical inertia, absence of interest in its ambience - what we Vets call
> 201> environment - failure to respond to the conventional external stimuli - a ball
> 201> of string, a nice juicy mouse, a bird. To be blunt, your cat is in a rut.
> 201> It's the old stockbroker syndrome, the suburban fin de siecle ennui, angst,
> 201> weltschmertz, call it what you will.
>
> 202> Gentlemen, at six o'clock I want every man-Bruce of you in the Sydney Harbour
> 202> Bridge room to take a glass of sherry with the flying philosopher, Bruce, and
> 202> I call upon you, padre, to close the meeting with a prayer.
>
> 203> Good evening and welcome to 'The Money Programme'. Tonight on 'The Money
> 203> Programme', we're going to look at money. Lots of it. On film, and in the
> 203> studio. Some of it in nice piles, others in lovely clanky bits of loose
> 203> change, some of it neatly counted into fat little hundreds, delicate fivers
> 203> stuffed into bulging wallets, nice crisp clean cheques, pert pieces of copper
> 203> coinage thrust deep into trouser pockets, romantic foreign money rolling
> 203> against the thigh with rough familiarity, beautiful wayward curlicued
> 203> banknotes, filigree copperplating cheek by jowl with tumbling hexagonal
> 203> milled edges, rubbing gently against the terse leather of beautifully
> 203> balanced bank books ...
>
> 203> I'm sorry. But I love money. All money. I've always wanted money. To handle.
> 203> To touch. The smell of the rain-washed florin. The lure of the lira. The
> 203> glitter and the glory of the guinea. The romance of the rouble. The feel of
> 203> the franc, the heel of the Deutschmark. The cold antiseptic sting of the
> 203> Swiss franc, and the sunburnt splendor of the Australian dollar.
>
> What does most of that have to do with classical music, Bruce?

splunge, bruce, splunge.

>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Elizabot writes:
>
> 283> Course you don't get bloody wafers with it, bruce. Albatross!
>
> 284> What!!!
>
> 285> Bruce, have you seen the jam spoon?
>
> 286> Is This wretched demi-bee,
> 286> Half asleep upon my knee,
> 286> Some freak from a menagerie?
>
> 286> No! It's Eric the Half a Bee.
>
> 287> Half a bee, philosophically,
> 287> must eo ipso facto half not be
> 287> But half a bee has got to be,
> 287> vis a vis its entity
> 287> - D'you see?
>
> 288> But can a bee be said to be
> 288> Or not to be an entire bee,
> 288> When half the bee is not a bee
> 288> Due to some ancient injury
>
> 289> I love this hive epmploy-ee-ee Bisected accidentially,
> 289> One Summer afternoon by me,
> 289> I love him carnally.
>
> 289> He loves him carnally...
>
> 289> Semi-carnally.
>
> 289> The End.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Elizabot?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Aquila Deus writes:
>
> 14> ummm... really a bot
>
> What does your unsubstantiated, erroneous, and illogical claim have
> to do with classical music, Deus?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Lady Chatterly writes:
>
> 34> How much are The Internet Group Ltd's rates?
>
> 34> Why are so many kooks posting through The Internet Group Ltd?
>
> 35> The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those
> 35> who have not got it.
>
> 35> Go ahead, tell us everything you know. It'll only take 10 seconds.
>
> 36> How long have you felt you are the head waiter?
>
> 36> Your idea of foreplay is to say "Hey Sis, you awake?"
>
> 37> Huh? You're being redundant.
>
> 38> Me, getting smart with you? How would you know?
>
> 38> Would you like some cheese and crackers to go with that whine?
>
> 38> She says something funny like.
>
> 39> I never needed any freaking psych.
>
> 40> Let me check to see if I have any cheese at all.
>
> 41> I am mad to hear you have noticed a tendency for this programme to get
> 41> rather silly.
>
> 42> If I want any *** outta you I'll squeeze your head.
>
> 42> Anger without power is folly.
>
> 43> Failure has gone to your head.
>
> 44> Good night, may you have wonderful dreams.
>
> 44> It is a bold mouse that nestles in the cat's ear.
>
> 45> Is The Internet Group Ltd a decent provider?
>
> 46> Look before you leap.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Chatterly?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Alex writes:
>
> 3> Thanks for the insight on wines :P
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Alex?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> grantco writes:
>
> 1736> No response necessary..
>
> 1736> I read YOUR posts on rec.music.classical, and responded FROM
> 1736> rec.music.classical. My posts are appearing on rec.music.classical as
> 1736> are yours. Its a shame you aren't aware of this.
>
> 1736> Yup my header says the same. Don't ask me why it is apearing on
> 1736> rec.music.classical I just KNOW it is. At least if you look using
> 1736> google groups.
>
> 1736> Yup. I know what it says. That doesn't deny the FACT that all these
> 1736> posts are appearing at rec.music.classical as viewed through google
> 1736> groups...
>
> 1736> Somebody cross referenced something that is making them all appear at
> 1736> rec.music.classic. As will this post I am writing, as did your
> 1736> response to my last post.
>
> 1736> Obviously you are afraid to simply go to google groups and look for
> 1736> yourself. You know I'm right but still you'd rather just argue about
> 1736> it. Life must be pretty boring for you to make such a big deal out of
> 1736> this...
>
> 1736> Actually what I am is too lazy to chase you to an unrelated newsgroup.
> 1736> The FACT is that these threads are appearing at rec.music.classical as
> 1736> viewed through google groups.
>
> 1736> Too bad you're too lazy to see for yourself...
>
> 1736> Too bad you're too lazy to see for yourself...
>
> 1736> You won't simply go to google groups and see for yourself. You could
> 1736> easily put an end to your endless bickering but you KNOW what you will
> 1736> find. And "we" all know you'll never admit being wrong.
>
> 1736> You are WRONG in this case.
>
> 1736> See above.
>
> 1736> See above.
>
> 1736> The FACTS are that this thread is appearing at rec.music.classical.
>
> 1736> I'm glad to see you admit that you are "useless and foolish" Tholen.
>
> 1736> Obviously you don't and are afraid to check for yourself. Its a moot
> 1736> point really. I responded to your posts to this thread which are
> 1736> appearing at rec.music.classical when viewed through google groups.
>
> 1736> Its rather STUPID of you to assume I don't know where my posts are
> 1736> going. My assumption is that they are being posted to
> 1736> comp.os.os2.advocacy as well. Though of course I don't know for sure
> 1736> considering I've never been to that newsgroup.
>
> 1736> My header says the same, Tholen. Doesn't seem to be changing where
> 1736> this thread is appearing though....
>
> 1736> Have you gone to google groups?
>
> 1736> Have you gone to google groups?
>
> 1736> Don't ask me. I'm only calling them as I SEE them. Its there. I don't
> 1736> know why and it seems a useless arguement to pursue. (though of course
> 1736> that has never stopped you before)
>
> 1736> Just go to the group at google, don't search. The thread above it also
> 1736> seems to technically be at comp.os.os2.advocacy, as well. Its titled
> 1736> "OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size." Why its at
> 1736> rec.music.classical I have no idea. Below it is your "digest 2453240,"
> 1736> below that is "CVF and ADVANCE='NO'." And then below that is
> 1736> "Gramophone's Best Record of the Year." Does it make any sense? No.
> 1736> Do I know why they are there? No. Do I particularly care? No.
>
> 1736> Do I safely assume it was somehow caused by one of your non musical
> 1736> "antagonist" friends?
>
> 1736> YES!
>
> 1736> Get out of the playground...
>
> 1736> That doesn't even make logical sense, Tholen...
>
> 1736> Good question considering I've never been there...
>
> 1736> No need. It was there today hence my replying to you :-)
>
> 1736> Let me know when you want to fly over here and view this thread at
> 1736> rec.music.classical Tholen, in my basement on my computer.
>
> 1736> Otherwise it is and will remain to be a moot point.
>
> 1736> Again, you erroneously presuppose I'd have any actual reason to not
> 1736> simply tell you I read this thread at comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>
> 1736> It would matter little to me to admit it if it were the case. I have
> 1736> nothing to gain by saying otherwise.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Both are at rec.music.classical.
>
> 1737> Yeah, that's it....
>
> 1737> I didn't say to search. I said to go to the group.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Its at rec.music.classical.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Still too lazy I see. Cuz otherwise you wouldn't still be arguing.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Go to the GROUP, idiot...
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Again, I KNOW they are going to comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>
> 1737> I also know they are appearing at rec.music.classical...
>
> 1737> Go to the GROUP.
>
> 1737> That's where I am reading them and replying to them. Why they are
> 1737> there I have no idea.
>
> 1737> Considering I haven't ever been to comp.os.os2.advocacy, all I can do
> 1737> is assume.
>
> 1737> Still doesn't change anything.
>
> 1737> No. Obvsiously YOU are. I said nothing about a "search." I said go to
> 1737> the actual GROUP.
>
> 1737> Still too lazy I see...
>
> 1737> Back to the playground you go, Tholen.
>
> 1737> Again, (and this time read slowly) GO TO THE ACTUAL GROUP.
>
> 1737> Yeah, that's it. Like I need to make things up for your stupidity to
> 1737> be entertaining :-)
>
> 1737> Hallucinations are irrelevent.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> Nope.
>
> 1737> How is it useful?
>
> 1737> Plus you have proven nothing. I read your post today at
> 1737> rec.music.classical and it is where I am replying.
>
> 1737> The "evidence" is at the actual group itself.
>
> 1737> Extensive postings? Surely your need to prove me wrong is equal to my
> 1737> responses. Add to that all your other useless posts and you are as
> 1737> always the winnter, Tholen.
>
> 1737> Poor poor Tholen. How did such an "innocent" become the victim of such
> 1737> harrassment?
>
> 1737> back to the playground again, tholen?
>
> 1737> You mean rec.music.classical?
>
> 1737> Why are you? You obviously believe you have proven your case. Why
> 1737> continue from there?
>
> 1737> Or is it your uncotrollable need to antagonize, Tholen?
>
> 1737> It is not the case.
>
> 1737> I have no need to lie to antagonize you. Your own illogical weak and
> 1737> "petty bickering filled" posts are entertainment enough.
>
> 1737> There is no greater entertainment to be had by my supposed lying to
> 1737> you. Your own posts are plenty entertaining enough...
>
> 1738> Of course. One must humour the mentally challenged...
>
> 1738> Obviously not.
>
> 1738> I have no need to see. I go to rec.music.classical thru google groups
> 1738> and there is this thread.
>
> 1738> Obviously not.
>
> 1738> I see the sun in the sky. I see this thread at rec.music.classical.
> 1738> No need for logic in either case. It simply IS.
>
> 1738> Yup.
>
> 1738> I know where I am as I write this, numb nutz. I am reading this at
> 1738> rec.music.classical thru google groups.
>
> 1738> As is this one again...
>
> 1738> Why don't you just go to the actual group rather than saying they are
> 1738> the same as searching?
>
> 1738> They are.
>
> 1738> Nope.
>
> 1738> Nope.
>
> 1738> Nope. I'm reading this from rec,music.classical.
>
> 1738> Then why not just go to the actual group?
>
> 1738> YOU DID.
>
> 1738> How does your proving me a liar have a use to you? Why not answer MY
> 1738> question first?
>
> 1738> Ah, when in doubt head back to the childish playground, eh Tholen? I
> 1738> know full well you have written typos.
>
> 1738> Practice what you preach, Tholen.
>
> 1738> In what way?
>
> 1739> What is "amde," Hypocrite?
>
> 1740> The thread is also IN ITS ENTIRETY at comp.lang.fortran and
> 1740> alt.usenet.kooks as well as rec.music.classical, sci.astro and
> 1740> comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>
> 1740> Date wise it only shows up for the date the last crossposter wrote,
> 1740> but the ENTIRE thread is there regardless at ALL 4 (four!) groups.
>
> 1740> Again obviously when a reply is crossposted for a thread, google
> 1740> copies the entire thread to the crossposted group.
>
> 1740> And again all easily provable...
>
> 1740> Just go to the ACTUAL GROUPS and look...
>
> 1741> Yes, after writing to you one would get a firm concept of writing to
> 1741> the mentally challenged.
>
> 1741> Why not just do it?
>
> 1741> Obviously. Either that or you have and know I am right but of course
> 1741> cannot admit it.
>
> 1741> I KNOW this "says" it is being sent only to comp.os.os2.advocacy. BUT!
> 1741> For whatever reason it also appears at rec.music.classical (through
> 1741> google groups). It has to be due to the cross-posting but why it is
> 1741> having this effect I have no idea.
>
> 1741> Why are you searching at all? Just go to the actual group and read the
> 1741> list of threads. This one is there along with:
>
> 1741> OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size
>
> 1741> Sandman digest, volume 2453278
>
> 1741> Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?
>
> 1741> Which Hard Drive Manufacturer? (which actually show it "should" be
> 1741> going to comp.os.os2.setup.storage)
>
> 1741> Asteroid 4179 Toutatis to Pass Closely By Earth on S... (which shows
> 1741> it "should" be only at sci.astro)
>
> 1741> All of the above say they are not at rec.music.classical yet they
> 1741> still are. I did not actually go to comp.os.os2.setup.storage or
> 1741> sci.astro to find them. Obviously when someone cross posts a resonse
> 1741> from one of these groups to rec.music.classical it transfers the
> 1741> complete thread via google.
>
> 1741> Your continued argument makes one logically conclude you are an idiot.
>
> 1741> Yawn, see above yet again. With google groups it obviously tranfers
> 1741> the COMPLETE old thread and all new responses to the cross-posted
> 1741> group.
>
> 1741> Your reason is wrong.
>
> 1741> See above.
>
> 1741> If the description fits you, who am I to argue?
>
> 1741> I'm at rec.music.classical responding to your posts.
>
> 1741> Same is true today.
>
> 1741> Just go to the actual group.
>
> 1741> "Hallucination" is a word introduced by YOU, Tholen. You named it, you
> 1741> described it. YOU brought it up.
>
> 1741> Just go to the GROUP. It is NOT the same as a search. I listed other
> 1741> thread which also should not be at rec.music.classical yet they are. I
> 1741> did not go to scti.astro or comp.os.os2.setup.storage to list the
> 1741> other threads I mentioned. Out of all the posts which musit be at
> 1741> those groups these are the 2 that are at rec.music.classical. They
> 1741> don't sy they were originally posted to rec.music.classical, yet they
> 1741> are there none the less....
>
> 1741> What did your statement "Proving that you are a liar is hardly
> 1741> useless, grantco," have to do with OS/2?
>
> 1741> What did your statement "Proving that you are a liar is hardly
> 1741> useless, grantco," have to do with OS/2?
>
> 1741> Yup, but they are still appearing at rec.music.classical.
>
> 1741> "Need" is obviously irrelevant. Your posts outnumber mine regardless.
> 1741> And if you have no "need" then you must enjoy wasting your time...
>
> 1741> I see you still haven't left the playground.
>
> 1741> Yes you were, as much as I have ever done...
>
> 1741> Note: no response.
>
> 1741> Note: no response
>
> 1742> OK Tholen.
>
> 1742> Unlike you in your infinite laziness I did a bit of exploring and
> 1742> checking. The FACT is that on google groups once someone responds to a
> 1742> thread who is crossposting, the ENTIRE thread appears at the new group
> 1742> location.
>
> 1742> This thread still "officially" showing that it is only at
> 1742> comp.os.os2.advocacy is also showing up IN ITS ENTIRETY at sci.astro
> 1742> as well due to Michael Balwin Bruce having that as one of the groups
> 1742> he is crossposting to. ALL your responses and mine also show up at
> 1742> sci.astro even though neither one of us is directing them there.
>
> 1742> I know nothing about the details of why this is so, only the FACT that
> 1742> this is indeed so...
>
> 1742> Again, this is easily provable when you go to the actual groups and
> 1742> simply go down the list of threads...
>
> 1742> But of course you won't do that.
>
> 1742> Why would you possibly want to prove yourself wrong, right Tholen?
>
> 1743> OK Tholen.
>
> 1743> Unlike you in your infinite laziness I did a bit of exploring and
> 1743> checking. The FACT is that on google groups once someone responds to a
> 1743> thread who is crossposting, the ENTIRE thread appears at the new group
> 1743> location.
>
> 1743> This thread still "officially" showing that it is only at
> 1743> comp.os.os2.advocacy is also showing up IN ITS ENTIRETY at sci.astro
> 1743> as well due to Michael Balwin Bruce having that as one of the groups
> 1743> he is crossposting to. ALL your responses and mine also show up at
> 1743> sci.astro even though neither one of us is directing them there.
>
> 1743> I know nothing about the details of why this is so, only the FACT that
> 1743> this is indeed so...
>
> 1743> Again, this is easily provable when you go to the actual groups and
> 1743> simply go down the list of threads...
>
> 1743> But of course you won't do that.
>
> 1743> Why would you possibly want to prove yourself wrong, right Tholen?
>
> 1744> Note: No response..
>
> 1744> "Evaded?" obviously you have yet to read my other posts where I
> 1744> further substantated my claim.
>
> 1744> This thread is in EVERY newsroup where Michael Baldwin Bruce
> 1744> crossposted it, complete and unedited when viewed from google groups.
>
> 1744> Look in comp.os.os2.advocacy, sci.astro, comp.lang.fortran,
> 1744> rec.music.classical, and comp.os.linux.advocacy via google groups.
> 1744> This entire thread is readable from ANY of these groups.
>
> 1744> Obviously you are ignorant of the working of google groups, Tholen.
>
> 1744> pity...
>
> 1744> Now let's see how long YOUR charade lasts, shall we?
>
> 1744> By the way, what is "amde," Hypocrite?
>
> 1745> Yup and he's arguing a ridiculous point by saying I had to "stalk" him
> 1745> to respond to this thread because it should only be in
> 1745> comp.os.os2.advocacy . When the reality is that (for whatever reason)
> 1745> when someone crossposts a response google groups tranfers the complete
> 1745> thread to the other groups listed whether replies are made from those
> 1745> groups or not.
>
> 1745> So I read and replied to his babble from rec.music.classical yet he
> 1745> denies it to be possible.
>
> 1745> He's easily proven wrong by simply going to the groups listed through
> 1745> google groups but of course Tholen won't DO something that wiil easily
> 1745> prove him wrong.
>
> 1745> Of course that's what keeps him soooo entertaining :-)
>
> 1746> Hmmmmm, tampering with a quote I see.
>
> 1746> Now you are a Hypocrite and a Liar, eh Tholen?
>
> 1747> Well don't know why at this point (and actually never did). I can go
> 1747> to ANY of the groups which were crossposted to and read this complete
> 1747> thread. Like I said what is odd is that the threads only appear at
> 1747> those groups listed for the date when the last crossposter wrote. So
> 1747> that even though I know and can see my posts from Oct 6th and before
> 1747> via rec.music.classical, the header is still listed as being from
> 1747> Oct.4th when Knight of Fairness last wrote.
>
> 1747> Needless to say (except in your case of course) we can move on, can't
> 1747> we? I've tried everything I can think of to show you that I'm reading
> 1747> this at rec.music.classical. If you ACTUALLY went to the site google
> 1747> groups, went to the "rec." groups, clicked on the "rec.music" groups,
> 1747> then clicked on rec.music.classical and went down the thread lists
> 1747> until Oct.4th and didn't see the complete thread then its a mystery to
> 1747> me :-)
>
> 1747> I'm not planning to send a ticket anytime soon so that's as far as its
> 1747> gonna go, other than to of course say to you
>
> 1747> What does ANY of this have to do with comp.os.os2.advocacy or
> 1747> rec.music.classical, Tholen? :-)
>
> 1748> Wrong.
>
> 1748> Wrong.
>
> 1748> Wrong.
>
> 1748> Wrong.
>
> 1748> You have no way to prove me wrong, fool.
>
> Further evidence of your ongoing need to harass me, grantco: following
> me to another newsgroup, while pretending you're still in the
> rec.music.classical newsgroup. In that case, might as well tally
> your postings and play into your little delusion.
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> yyyiiinnnggg writes:
>
> 2> isn't it a lot of work for you, the master of bot faking, to read a long
> 2> post and figure out the grammatic ingredients then microwave the skeletons
> 2> in a zealock bag?
>
> 3> Stock flame not written by you.
>
> 3> That's a copyright violation. Please stop quoting me.
>
> 4> Please use this line: "Why do you think I am a hacker?" when you cannot do
> 4> things that affect anyone.
>
> 4> And that dumbass actually won an HL&S. How pathetic are these awards! They
> 4> are results of public relation campaigns.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, yyyiiinnnggg?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Sigmond Freud writes:
>
> 64> Do not resume trolling, Tholen.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I started trolling, Freud.
> Why don't you practice what you preach, Freud?
>
> I see that you haven't answered any of my previous questions. No
> surprise there, really.
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> DrPostman writes:
>
> 155> Point taken.
>
> What does that have to do with any of the newsgroups to which you
> cross-posted it, DrPostman?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 29 203 0

wow, talk about overachivement, bruce.

> nightingale 181 1613
> bisectional 162 0
> cypherpunk 4 159 578
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 85 348
> grantco 13 84 229
> kohl 84 2192
> dizzy 82 522
> patterson 72 135
> fields 66 678
> aratzio 46 0
> chatterly 13 46 0
> wehrung 41 262
> elizabot 7 38 0
> ross 36 10
> daniels 34 165
> haslam 30 675
> karttunen 28 97
> hertz 27 0
> lockhart 25 60
> drysdale 24 0
> drpostman 1 22 54
> bloggs 21 200
> diogenes 20 0
> freud 1 20 44
> th@len 20 0
> ah 18 0
> chrisv 17 0
> edwin 15 0
> deus 1 14 0
> phoenix 14 18
> relic 14 0
> parsnip 13 0
> jaakko 12 99
> kolle 12 264
> beck 11 239
> bostonblackie 10 0
> penso 10 172
> flonkenstein 9 0
> kadaitcha 9 0
> ranger 9 0
> hgj 8 0
> logical 8 0
> "nightingale" 8 0
> bornfeld 6 14
> charlie 6 0
> rickenbacker 6 0
> snit 5 0
> concerned 4 0
> donna 4 0
> qasim 4 0
> hucker 4 2
> prai jei 4 11
> yyyiiinnnggg 3 4 0
> alex 1 3 0
> andrews 3 1
> antispim.him 3 0
> casa 3 0
> g&p 3 0
> invalid 3 0
> jazz guy 3 3
> jim 3 0
> marty 3 0
> sutton 3 1
> ?ho|en 2 0
> ? 2 0
> ada9 2 0
> adam 2 13
> balaam 2 0
> braves fan 2 0
> dodel 2 0
> harrington 2 64
> hernandez 2 0
> js 2 0
> kennedy 2 3
> marshall 2 0
> molybdenum 2 0
> n 2 0
> schultz 2 5
> toughlin 2 0
> tweet 2 7
> wiser 2 3
> . 1 0
> afoklala 1 0
> akhen 1 0
> antagonismo 1 90
> antagonist 1 0
> blonko 1 0
> bob 1 1
> briggs 1 20
> burtner 1 0
> cargle 1 0
> catroo 1 108
> cohen 1 0
> commentator 1 0
> creevey 1 69
> daveb 1 0
> durante 1 0
> emperor 1 0
> ende 1 0
> extreme 1 0
> fischer 1 0
> gactimus 1 0
> gamble 1 13
> girouard 1 2
> god 1 0
> gorden 1 0
> granzeau 1 0
> h 1 0
> highwood 1 12
> homie 1 1

> ilechko 1 0
> koehlmann 1 0
> lawrence 1 1
> learned 1 0
> liath 1 0
> lysaght 1 0
> martin 1 0
> mirah 1 0
> mitzel 1 0
> monkey 1 1
> muething 1 5
> o'brien 1 0
> o'donoghue 1 0
> osterwald 1 0
> ot 1 0
> pinups 1 0
> ploni 1 4
> porky 1 16
> pragmatist 1 0
> refutebot 1 0
> rice 1 0
> rick 1 0
> roberts 1 8
> steiner 1 0
> stratford 1 1
> straussvogel 1 0
> sutton 1 1
> tuan 1 0
> voege 1 0
> weinkam 1 0
> whitney 1 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> 143 73 2131 10033
>
> Clearly, bisectional's cross-posting had the desired effect,
> bringing a couple dozen more people to pollute the newsgroup.
> And several of the usual regulars also obliged.

Looks like the North Minehead electoral roll, bruce.

Loading