Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel."
From: 'Hobbit's' skull (rolf184_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Dale: "Re: Selective Service begins Hiring, Bush May Reinstate Military Draft"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- In reply to: Robert Clark: "Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- Next in thread: Jim Gerrie: "Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- Reply: Jim Gerrie: "Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:32:32 -0500
"Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:832ea96d.0410291006.162fb295@posting.google.com...
> During a web search I came upon a news article
> describing a method of using water pressure at the bottom of the sea to
launch
> rockets (1). I had started a discussion last year on sci.astro about the
> possibility of piping the fuel up to a rocket during ascent rather than
> carrying the entire fuel load from the beginning of the trip (2).
> During this discussion, someone raised the possibility of just using the
> momentum of the moving fuel alone to provide the propulsion (3). I wanted
to get
> some input on the feasibility of this idea.
> I wanted to keep the fuel piped up gaseous to save weight. You can keep
the
> density low at high pressure by making the temperature high. See (4) to
> calculate the density and other physical properties of hydrogen based on
> pressure and temperature. For example, at 500 bars and 3000 K, the density
is
> only 4.1 kg/m^3.
> Carbon fibers already exist of sufficient strength to support their own
> weight over 100 km (5). These fibers are also of high melting temperature.
So
> could probably withstand say 3000 k temperatures.
> As for pumping the gas up to 100 km heights at those pressures, I suggest
> some type of "ram pump" (6). However, note that the Space Shuttle already
uses
> pumps for its liquid hydrogen and oxygen capable of hundreds of bars of
> pressure (7).
> Some of the things I would like some feedback on are the feasibility of
> moving gasous hydrogen through a 100km long pipe at 500 bar and 3000 K,
> assuming we have a carbon fiber material that can withstand the
temperatures,
> and perhaps most importantly, what would be the aerodynamical effects of a
100
> km long tube, say .1 meters wide, moving at hypersonic speeds.
>
That was all figured out with the Space Elevator.
Just use the Elevator to move it up to where your rocket is and load the
fuel on there.
Googleit
- Next message: Dale: "Re: Selective Service begins Hiring, Bush May Reinstate Military Draft"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- In reply to: Robert Clark: "Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- Next in thread: Jim Gerrie: "Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- Reply: Jim Gerrie: "Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel.""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|