Re: digest 2453312

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 11/03/04 

Date: 3 Nov 2004 01:51:35 -0800

tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<h1Vhd.59755$Kl3.49447@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> Art Deco writes:
>
> 3> [snip]
>
> 3> Yes! UV point for moi! Thanks, Tholenator!
>
> 3> Well done, sir!
>
> 4> Phear the Grand Lady!
>
> 4> And don't forget to bump my numbers, Tholenator.
>
> 5> What does any of this have to do with researching BBQ alien recipies,
> 5> pjross?
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Deco?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Ross writes:
>
> 128> I see. Now Davie is offering psychological evaluations on top of his other
> 128> contributions to Usenet.
>
> 128> Indeed. His claims of others' hypocrisy peg the needle on my IronyMeter
> 128> (tm).
>
> 129> [flush much]
>
> 129> Woo Hoo! Davie hasn't forgotten about me! I'm not particularily
> 129> thrilled about being so low on the lits, what with 'Ratz three above me.
> 129> I guess it is time to work on The Mighty Poast Count.
>
> 129> [...]
>
> 129> [...]
>
> 129> [...]
>
> 129> Anyway, I am ahead of some very distinguished kookologists.
>
> 130> Davey thinks I'm you, so this is actually a joint litsing.
>
> 130> Is this a crossposters digest or an antagonist's [sic] digest? I
> 130> think Davey ought to make it clear. I'd hate to presuppose erroneously
> 130> that it's the wrong kind.
>
> 131> <splorf!>
>
> 131> Gee, one would think would fairly simple to distinguish between your
> 131> obviously polished literary style, resulting from your formidable British
> 131> education, and my rather pompous Canuck style of 'riten', eh, the result
> 131> of a one room sod school house on the bald Saskatchewan prairie, where we
> 131> had to resort to doing our home-work on the back of a shovel with a chunk
> 131> of coal.
>
> 131> Davie never was the sharpest knife in the drawer.
>
> 132> Classic antagonism, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> 132> argument.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Ross?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Aratzio writes:
>
> 48> The yeah but I am the filling on a bot sandwich. Chatterly is above us
> 48> both.
>
> 49> Yes, but you live with the kook.
>
> What does the fact that we have to live with you have to do with
> classical music, Aratzio?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> 1> From: <tholen@antispam.ham>
> 1> Message-ID: <2uqde5F2efssdU1@uni-berlin.de>
>
> 1> grantco, please stop.
>
> What does your forgery have to do with classical music?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> "Nightingale" writes:
>
> 9> What are you trying to do - catch up to me? I've got too much of a lead, so
> 9> you might as well give up now!
>
> 10> You're so mean! Why do you harrass him so?
>
> 10> I will always love you Tholen.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, nightingale?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Free Speech writes:
>
> 1> pjross wants some tan on his slimy white ass.
>
> 2>
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Speech?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> yyyiiinnnggg writes:
>
> 6> Message-ID: <cm8vfb$4u6$0@pita.alt.net>
>
> What does your empty response have to do with classical music,
> yyyiiinnnggg?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Brendan R. Wehrung writes:
>
> 488> Does it give any pause to think that since Hawaii votes last in a very
> 488> close election, and the state itself is up for grabs this time, it may be
> 488> Tholen's vote that tips the balance one way or the other?
>
> 488> Every vote does count, but only if you cast it.
>
> 488> Please vote today, even if it rains (as it will here).
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Wehrung?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
>
> 227> they call me bruce, bruce.
>
> Still suffering from attribution problems, Bruce?
>
> 227> how do you know that, bruce?
>
> 227> is that right, bruce?
>
> 227> Non sequitur? Do you read that comic too, bruce?
>
> 227> is that right, bruce? You claim to to be a troll? On what basis do you
> 227> make that claim, troll?
>
> What do all your questions to yourself have to do with classical music,
> Bruce?

if you read that comic strip, bruce, its OK. just come out of the closet
and admit it.

>
> 227> more evidence that this Hawaiian kook is a troll.
>
> What does your claim that you are Hawaiian have to do with classical
> music, Bruce?

I have a hawaiian shirt, bruce. it looks like someone threw up on it.
is everyone who lives in hawaii a kook, bruce?

>
> 228> Non sequitur? Again with the comics, bruce? No wonder you are so infantile.
>
> 228> 36 times? Are you a kook with OCD, bruce?
>
> What do all your questions to yourself have to do with classical music,
> Bruce?

are you talking to yourself again, bruce?

>
> 229> LOL!! Do they let kooks like Davie Tholen vote in Hawaii, bruce?
> 229> He'll just throw it away on Nader anyway. Kooks are like that.
>
> What does your question to yourself have to do with classical music,
> Bruce?

who is "yourself", bruce?

>
> ===========================================================================
>
> bisectional2004@yahoo.ca writes:
>
> 166> And bruce, nightingale & I are ahead of you all!
>
> 167> He's too busy today because he has the important vote to decide on. Tholen
> 167> lost in thought - it's such unfamilliar territory for him!
>
> 168> The cat came back...
>
> What does tha fact that you came back have to do with classical music,
> bisectional?

did you come back to yourself, bruce?

>
> 168> About as much as your digest, kooky.
>
> 168> We all know who tholen@antispam.ham is, kooky.
>
> 168> About as much as your digest, kooky.
>
> 168> LOL! They have newsgroups for the strangest things.
>
> 168> LOL!
>
> 168> Perhaps a simple one-line post, without all the other crap to antagonise
> 168> grantco, saying just "Please do not continue this." might work Giving
> 168> grantco the last word might work as well. We'll never get the chance to find
> 168> out though.
>
> 168> Google shows otherwise.
>
> 168> What do you call this silly digest then?
>
> 168> Why don't you ask Freud?
>
> 168> For what strange value of "today" does this post belong here? Talk about
> 168> obsession, it's unbelievable that you have to go hunting back for month old
> 168> posts to include in your antagonists digest!
>
> 168> And yet again - she's one of the few people who is still nice to you, and
> 168> you treat her like dirt. If this is how you treat people who like you, I'll
> 168> bet you don't have a friend in the world.
>
> 168> Tied with Shorty! I'll have to do something about that.
>
> 168> Well, this is a nice bit of evidence to prove who is the real disruptive
> 168> element of the group - averages a little over one post a day in your
> 168> absence, and that's only by including old posts & posts of people who spoke
> 168> up in support of you. Brendan & Nightingale don't belong on your
> 168> antagonists list.
>
> 169> Evidence points to the correctness of grantco's statement.
>
> 169> Why do you continue to antagonize grantco, tholen?
>
> 170> Heaven help us all!
>
> What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
> bisectional?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> HGJ writes:
>
> 9> Who chose it then?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, HGJ?
>
> 9> I had not posted anything to any of those three
> 9> groups when you posted the following:
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, HGJ?
>
> 9> One part of my reply was this:
>
> What does your repetition have to do with classical music, HGJ?

isn't classical music repetitive, bruce?

>
> 9> I posted the above because I suspected that Monica (Molybdenum) and
> 9> Rowe would not go to rec.music.classical and read your questions to
> 9> them.
>
> What does your concern for Monica and Rowe have to do with classical
> music, HGJ?
>
> 9> Another part of my reply was this:
>
> What does your repetition have to do with classical music, HGJ?
>
> 9> I asked the above question because I wanted to know the significance
> 9> of the number 2453233 in the subject line you had chosen.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, HGJ?
>
> 9> Se above.
>
> Se [sic] my response above, HGJ.
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 3 229 0
> nightingale 183 1613
> bisectional 5 170 0
> cypherpunk 165 578
> grantco 116 229
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 86 349
> kohl 84 2192
> dizzy 82 522
> patterson 72 135
> fields 66 678
> aratzio 2 49 0
> chatterly 48 0
> wehrung 1 43 262
> elizabot 41 0
> ross 5 41 10
> daniels 34 165
> karttunen 33 97
> haslam 30 675
> drpostman 27 54
> hertz 27 0
> lockhart 25 60
> drysdale 24 0
> bloggs 21 200
> freud 21 44
> diogenes 20 0
> th@len 20 0
> ah 19 0
> chrisv 17 0
> edwin 15 0
> deus 14 0
> phoenix 14 18
> relic 14 0
> parsnip 13 0
> jaakko 12 99
> kolle 12 264
> beck 11 239
> bostonblackie 10 0
> "nightingale" 2 10 0
> penso 10 172
> flonkenstein 9 0
> hgj 1 9 0
> kadaitcha 9 0
> ranger 9 0
> logical 8 0
> bornfeld 6 14
> charlie 6 0
> rickenbacker 6 0
> yyyiiinnnggg 1 6 0
> deco 3 5 0
> prai jei 5 11
> snit 5 0
> concerned 4 0
> donna 4 0
> extreme 4 0
> qasim 4 0
> hucker 4 2
> alex 3 0
> andrews 3 1
> antispim.him 3 0
> casa 3 0
> g&p 3 0
> invalid 3 0
> jazz guy 3 3
> jim 3 0
> marty 3 0
> sutton 3 1
> ?ho|en 2 0
> ? 2 0
> ada9 2 0
> adam 2 13
> balaam 2 0
> braves fan 2 0
> dodel 2 0
> harrington 2 64
> hernandez 2 0
> js 2 0
> kennedy 2 3
> marshall 2 0
> molybdenum 2 0
> n 2 0
> schultz 2 5
> speech 2 2 0
> toughlin 2 0
> tweet 2 7
> wiser 2 3
> . 1 0
> afoklala 1 0
> akhen 1 0
> antagonismo 1 90
> antagonist 1 0
> blonko 1 0
> bob 1 1
> briggs 1 20
> burtner 1 0
> cargle 1 0
> catroo 1 108
> cohen 1 0
> commentator 1 0
> creevey 1 69
> daveb 1 0
> durante 1 0
> emperor 1 0
> ende 1 0
> fischer 1 0
> gactimus 1 0
> gamble 1 13
> girouard 1 2
> god 1 0
> gorden 1 0
> granzeau 1 0
> h 1 0
> highwood 1 12
> homie 1 1
> ilechko 1 0
> koehlmann 1 0
> lawrence 1 1
> learned 1 0
> liath 1 0
> lysaght 1 0
> martin 1 0
> mirah 1 0
> mitzel 1 0
> monkey 1 1
> muething 1 5
> o'brien 1 0
> o'donoghue 1 0
> osterwald 1 0
> ot 1 0
> pinups 1 0
> ploni 1 4
> porky 1 16
> pragmatist 1 0
> refutebot 1 0
> rice 1 0
> rick 1 0
> roberts 1 8
> steiner 1 0
> stratford 1 1
> straussvogel 1 0
> sutton 1 1
> "tholen" 1 1 0
> tuan 1 0
> voege 1 0
> weinkam 1 0
> whitney 1 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> 146 26 2250 10033

Relevant Pages

  • Re: digest 2453312
    ... > 4> And don't forget to bump my numbers, Tholenator. ... > 488> Does it give any pause to think that since Hawaii votes last in a very ... > 227> they call me bruce, ... > Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, HGJ? ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: digest 2453316
    ... Tholenator wrote: ... > 236> like you are one to know, bruce. ... are youz one dumb asstronomer. ... Go a hard on for Ross have youz, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: digest 2453316
    ... Tholenator wrote: ... > 236> like you are one to know, bruce. ... are youz one dumb asstronomer. ... Go a hard on for Ross have youz, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: digest 2453316
    ... > 7> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ... > 8> argument, Tholenator. ... why do you ask, bruce? ... Go a hard on for Ross have youz, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: digest 2453316
    ... > 7> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ... > 8> argument, Tholenator. ... why do you ask, bruce? ... Go a hard on for Ross have youz, ...
    (sci.astro)