Re: digest 2453311

From: Son of Kit (freddie.berkowitz.shorts_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/05/04 

Date: 5 Nov 2004 10:22:23 -0800

davie tholen@antispam.ham the kook asstronomer wrote in message news:<hAwhd.45385$Kl3.21624@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> grantco writes:
>
> 1780> Back again I see, Tholen? You just can't stand not having the
> 1780> attention, can you?
>
> What do your questions, coupled with an erroneous presupposition, have
> to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Which question? The one you answered with rather than answering my
> 1780> question?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
>
> 1780> "Your from seeing them," Tholen? What does "your from seeing them,"
> 1780> mean tholen? or did you merely incorrectly add an "r" To the word
> 1780> "you," Tholen?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> It should be simple for you to admit, Tholen. After all we all make
> 1780> simple typing mistakes :-)
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> But back to your comment, yes your other post did appear at
> 1780> rec.music.classical as part of a crosspost by Bruce. I had no need to
> 1780> go to the other groups you antagonize to read it.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, coupled with the erroneous
> presupposition that I antagonize other groups, grantco. Rather ironic,
> coming from someone who followed me to another group to continue his
> antagonism.
>
> 1780> Again if you are so
> 1780> irritated by my not responding to your alleged post to me, merely tell
> 1780> me where it is and I will oblige you with a response.
>
> What does your hypothetical situation have to do with classical music,
> grantco? Still trying to spin doctor your ironic retreat, grantco?
>
> 1780> Why should I when you obviously not only know the answer but brought
> 1780> the topic up yourself?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> More deletions from Hypocrital Tholen.
>
> Non sequitur, coupled with an unsubstantiated and erroneous claim of
> hypocrisy, which is rather ironic, coming from a hypocrite, the
> evidence for which appears at the end of the grantco portion of the
> digest.
>
> 1780> And you're STILL discussing it.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> Otherwise what does your mention of a
> 1780> post you wrote to me in another group have to do with classical music,
> 1780> Hypocrite?
>
> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco? Still suffering from attribution
> problems?
>
> 1780> What does your discussion about a post you wrote to me in another
> 1780> group, Hypocrite?
>
> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco? Still suffering from attribution
> problems?
>
> 1780> No, hypocrite.
>
> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco? Still suffering from attribution
> problems?
>
> 1780> So it is your position that the word "retreat" equals you writing a
> 1780> post in another group which I didn't respond to?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Are you again rewriting the dictionary Dr. Tholen? Or is it Dr.
> 1780> Webster?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Ah, back to playground logic, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> Feel free to assume that when I
> 1780> am responding to your post that it is you I am responding to Tholen.
> 1780> Or am I to assume that such simple logic is too difficult for you to
> 1780> understand?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> I am so ashamed for you, Tholen. Not only are you dishonest but also
> 1780> have such a strong tendency for denial.
>
> What does your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with
> classical music, grantco? Rather ironic, coming from someone so
> dishonest, the evidence for which can be found at the end of the
> grantco portion of the digest.
>
> 1780> Tsk tsk...
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> liar.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
> from a liar, the evidence for which appears at the end of the grantco
> portion of the digest.
>
> 1780> It is? Care to substantiate your incorrect and erroneous claim,
> 1780> Tholen?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> You say that like I've never answered that question before, Tholen. Am
> 1780> I to assume that your memory is that short?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> I post here because you are addressing a post to me here, Tholen.
>
> Figures that you would completely ignore the fact that I responded
> because you "addressed a post to me here", grantco. Trace it
> backward far enough, and you'll discover that you were the one who
> instigated the exhange.
>
> 1780> It
> 1780> is beyond my control to stop you from posting off-topic posts to me.
>
> Irrelevant, given that I haven't posted any off-topic posts to you,
> grantco. Rather ironic, coming from the person who keeps posting
> off-topic posts to me, strictly for entertainment purposes.
>
> 1780> Perhaps if your post to me was ABOUT classical music, my response
> 1780> would also be about classical music.
>
> Liar; I have frequently asked what your responses have to do with
> classical music, grantco, but you don't answer the questions.
>
> 1780> Plus, what does "post there here," mean, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Or did you merely accidently mean "them" rather than "there," Tholen?
> 1780> Again such errors are common when typing. Maybe you should just admit
> 1780> it?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> No, you are a Hypocrite, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> I am addressing you.
>
> Ah, so you admit to suffering from attribution problems.
>
> 1780> And if you ask
> 1780> again I will have to conclude that you are having short term memory
> 1780> difficulties.
>
> Illogical conclusions are nothing new for you, grantco.
>
> 1780> The "irony of my retreat," has nothing to do with classical music,
> 1780> Tholen.
>
> Then why did you bring up the matter of an alleged retreat in a
> classical music newsgroup, grantco?
>
> 1780> Thank you for substantiating my claim that you are posting
> 1780> posts to me which are off-topic, Tholen.
>
> Still suffering from memory problems, grantco? You're the one who
> brought the matter of an alleged retreat. Rather ironic, coming
> from someone who retreated.
>
> 1780> Or should I call you hypocrite, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1780> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1780> When?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1780> Rather ironic coming from the person who isn't MAN enough not to
> 1780> delete the evidence provided by those he is talking to, Tholen.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that what you've included constitutes
> evidence, grantco.
>
> 1780> Obviously I need to again quote you:
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> And yet in this very post to me you wrote:
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> and:
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> and:
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Pure and simple evidence of your being a Hypocrite, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> And if and
> 1780> when you remove the above evidence it will be further evidence of your
> 1780> dishonesty, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> Typical...
>
> The truth is typical of me, grantco.
>
> 1780> And of course I forgot the REAL clincher:
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> The evidence above again proves otherwise, Tholen.
>
> I'm well aware that the evidence I've presented proves your claims to
> be otherwise, grantco.
>
> 1780> Or are you Dr. Hypocrite? Or is it Dr. Suess? Or Dr. Webster?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> I keep forgetting due to your continued dishonesty, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of dishonesty, which is rather
> ironic, coming from a dishonest person, the evidence for which
> appears at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>
> 1780> Hardly.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> You are? Then what need is there for you to delete it? Are you
> 1780> embarrassed, Tholen?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, Tholen.
>
> I'm well aware that your claim is unsubstantiated and erroneous,
> grantco.
>
> 1780> You mean like the evidence I continue to provide which you are not MAN
> 1780> enough not to delete, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> You are the hypocrite, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> And my claim is substantiated the moment you delete my evidence.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> Your NEED to delete merely proves your guilt, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> Again your evidence is no more damning of me than the evidence I
> 1780> provide which you dishonestly delete, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1780> Mmmm, big words there, Tholen. Did your mommy help you write that?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> I claim the right to, Tholen.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that the right exists, grantco.
>
> 1780> What are you going to do about it?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Cry?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> What other defense would I have when writing to a trolling lying
> 1780> hypocrite like you, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1780> Just ask without responding to my other words Tholen and you would get
> 1780> your wish. Its so simple yet you are unable to do it.
>
> Still trying to alter the conditions, eh grantco? Still not man enough
> to admit that you lied when you wrote:
>
> "I've told him all he would have to do is literally ASK
> for me not to continue and I would do it."
> --grantco
>
> Evidence that grantco is a fool:
>
> "As always you erroneously assume that the foolishness
> of these exchanges with you is not apparent to me. I
> acknowledge the foolishness."
> --grantco
>
> "My threads are in the postings."
> --grantco
>
> Evidence for grantco's hypocrisy:
>
> "Actually I care little about a waste of bandwidth."
> --grantco
>
> "Just don't reply Tholen."
> --grantco
>
> "I've told him all he would have to do is literally ASK
> for me not to continue and I would do it."
> --grantco
>
> [37] Would you not continue, grantco?
>
> Above is evidence that grantco lied, given that I did ask (36 times)
> for him not to continue.
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 226 0
> nightingale 183 1613
> bisectional 165 0
> cypherpunk 165 578
> grantco 1 116 229
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 86 349
> kohl 84 2192
> dizzy 82 522
> patterson 72 135
> fields 66 678
> chatterly 48 0
> aratzio 47 0
> wehrung 42 262
> elizabot 41 0
> ross 36 10
> daniels 34 165
> karttunen 33 97
> haslam 30 675
> drpostman 27 54
> hertz 27 0
> lockhart 25 60
> drysdale 24 0
> bloggs 21 200
> freud 21 44
> diogenes 20 0
> th@len 20 0
> ah 19 0
> chrisv 17 0
> edwin 15 0
> deus 14 0
> phoenix 14 18
> relic 14 0
> parsnip 13 0
> jaakko 12 99
> kolle 12 264
> beck 11 239
> bostonblackie 10 0
> penso 10 172
> flonkenstein 9 0
> kadaitcha 9 0
> ranger 9 0
> hgj 8 0
> logical 8 0
> "nightingale" 8 0
> bornfeld 6 14
> charlie 6 0
> rickenbacker 6 0
> prai jei 5 11
> snit 5 0
> yyyiiinnnggg 5 0
> concerned 4 0
> donna 4 0
> extreme 4 0
> qasim 4 0
> hucker 4 2
> alex 3 0
> andrews 3 1
> antispim.him 3 0
> casa 3 0
> g&p 3 0
> invalid 3 0
> jazz guy 3 3
> jim 3 0
> marty 3 0
> sutton 3 1
> ?ho|en 2 0
> ? 2 0
> ada9 2 0
> adam 2 13
> balaam 2 0
> braves fan 2 0
> deco 2 0
> dodel 2 0
> harrington 2 64
> hernandez 2 0
> js 2 0
> kennedy 2 3
> marshall 2 0
> molybdenum 2 0
> n 2 0
> schultz 2 5
> toughlin 2 0
> tweet 2 7
> wiser 2 3
> . 1 0
> afoklala 1 0
> akhen 1 0
> antagonismo 1 90
> antagonist 1 0
> blonko 1 0
> bob 1 1
> briggs 1 20
> burtner 1 0
> cargle 1 0
> catroo 1 108
> cohen 1 0
> commentator 1 0
> creevey 1 69
> daveb 1 0
> durante 1 0
> emperor 1 0
> ende 1 0
> fischer 1 0
> gactimus 1 0
> gamble 1 13
> girouard 1 2
> god 1 0
> gorden 1 0
> granzeau 1 0
> h 1 0
> highwood 1 12
> homie 1 1
> ilechko 1 0
> koehlmann 1 0
> lawrence 1 1
> learned 1 0
> liath 1 0
> lysaght 1 0
> martin 1 0
> mirah 1 0
> mitzel 1 0
> monkey 1 1
> muething 1 5
> o'brien 1 0
> o'donoghue 1 0
> osterwald 1 0
> ot 1 0
> pinups 1 0
> ploni 1 4
> porky 1 16
> pragmatist 1 0
> refutebot 1 0
> rice 1 0
> rick 1 0
> roberts 1 8
> steiner 1 0
> stratford 1 1
> straussvogel 1 0
> sutton 1 1
> tuan 1 0
> voege 1 0
> weinkam 1 0
> whitney 1 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> 144 1 2224 10033

Say, kook? Were youz breastfed as a child? Up until what age? 11 or 12? 

--
Freddie D. '***' Shorts
I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!
Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
Contact me by email (mailto:cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com) or mail me at
FS Newssite Inc.
101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
I like to steal copyrighted material.
Check out my current web sites -
http://www.orwellian.org
http://www.miscstuff.org
http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/
I'm really proud of this -
http://Frederick.Shorts.swellserver.com/news/top_stories/worldrecord.php
http://www.plugger.info
http://www.pluggers.com/daily/
Hay! My kinda place - http://www.gaylordhotels.com/
Quantcast