Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 11/06/04 

Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:07:35 GMT

"Aleksandr Timofeev" <a_n_timofeev@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:e16a4a22.0411050241.3a39b856@posting.google.com...
> junebug@pgrb.com (Quantum Mirror) wrote:
> >a_n_timofeev@my-deja.com (Aleksandr Timofeev) wrote in message
news:<e16a4a22.0411040214.5469b95b@posting.google.com>...
> >> junebug@pgrb.com (Quantum Mirror) wrote in message
news:<7b043f08.0411021415.6b08015@posting.google.com>...
> >> > a_n_timofeev@my-deja.com (Aleksandr Timofeev) wrote in message
news:<e16a4a22.0411020320.929baec@posting.google.com>...
>
> [snip]
>
> >> > > "THey are concerened with macro interference for resolution.
> >>
> >>
> >> In your interpretation MACRO INTERFERENCE should be an immediate
> >> corollary
> >> of a SELF-INTERFERENCE of a PHOTON.
> >>
> >> THE SELF-INTERFERENCE of a PHOTON is the unconditional(marginal)
> >> requirement of Feynman for a HYPOTHETICAL PHOTON, which one
> >> in Feynman's REPRESENTATION of a VIRTUAL REALITY is a quantum
> >> microparticle:
> >>
> >> Dear "Quantum Mirror":
> >>
> >> Whether I am correct perceive you?
> >>
> >>
> >> Scientifically fancy fairy tale about an interference
> >> of photons on two slots is adduced in the book:
> >>
> >> Richard Feynman "THE CHARACTER OF PHISICAL LAW";
> >> A series of lectures recorded by the BBC at Cornell University USA;
> >> Cox and Wynman LTD, London, 1965
> >>
> >> Richard Feynman were concerned about a particle "photon" apparently
> >> and " simultaneously " travelling two different paths.
> >>
> >> =============================================================
> >> This fairy tale is refuted easily by experimental existence
> >> of a virtual interference in VLBI. ;o)
> >> =============================================================
> >>
> >> Dear "Quantum Mirror":
> >>
> >> Whether I am correct perceive you?
> >>
> >>
> >> > > This is the mistake you have made!!!"
> >
> >No one in astronomy, has ever or will ever claim that a photon of ANY
> >kind, is "SELF" interfering in a telescope! This is your silly
> >mistake!!
>
> "No one in astronomy"
>
> Thus I can state the actual fact, that you confirm my assertion about
> impossibility of a self-interference " of a sci-fi chimerical photon "
> in VLBI.
>
> Whether this my assertion corresponds to a reality?
>
> But then here we have large problems with orthodox theoretical
> physics.

What we have is large problems with people like you who do not understand
it.

> Feynman would deride you. Feynman is the apologist theoretical physics
> and personally theorist - creator of QED.

Feyman was a great physicist - you are an idiot (lest you chide me for
calling you an idiot you might like to consider the actual evidence you have
for the rather unflattering way you characterized Feynman).

>
> >They bring as many photons as possible together and compare
> >them either digitally (magnetic tape) or physically (lens)!
>
> Here we have two problems concerning to a theoretical physics:
>
> 1. "They bring as many photons as possible together"
>
> 2. "compare them either digitally (magnetic tape) or physically
> (lens)!"
>
> Let's discuss the first problem - :
>
> "They bring as many photons as possible together"
>
> Please describe in detail this physical process at a quantum level of
> comprehension of actual processes of interaction of an electromagnetic
> radiation with substance, i.e. describe process of detection of an
> electromagnetic radiation in single VLBI radiometer.

That is the essence of the wave particle duality - it is an accepted
principle requiring no further explanation. The principle is that
'particles' do not exist 'waves' do not exist - all that exits is quantum
stuff. Of course in a telescope one does not actually need to invoke QM -
classical EM will do just fine. But as a matte of principle it too has QM
as its basis - just like all classical phenomena does.

>
>
> >This is
> >how they produce DETAIL and Angular resolution! You are embarrassing
> >the Russian academy of science with this stupid argument!
>
> don't hurry!, take your time!
> Where are you going in such a hurry?...

Because your constant posting of the smae drivel is annoying.

Bill

>
> ---
> >;^)))

Relevant Pages

  • Re: mass of the photon
    ... Introduction to High Energy Physics, by Donald Perkins, especially ... at least one intermediate course in quantum mechanics, ... eigenvalue solution for the proton that can sit inside a composite ... 'Balmer-like' analytic solution to the spectroscopy of the photon ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: mass of the photon
    ... Introduction to High Energy Physics, by Donald Perkins, especially ... Feynman's work (via his famous 3 physics books and some other ... at least one intermediate course in quantum mechanics, ... 'Balmer-like' analytic solution to the spectroscopy of the photon ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI
    ... > junebug@pgrb.com (Quantum Mirror) wrote: ... has ever or will ever claim that a photon of ANY ... > Here we have two problems concerning to a theoretical physics: ... principle requiring no further explanation. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI
    ... > junebug@pgrb.com (Quantum Mirror) wrote: ... has ever or will ever claim that a photon of ANY ... > Here we have two problems concerning to a theoretical physics: ... principle requiring no further explanation. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Whats wrong with loop quantum gravity
    ... > principle, allow the number of dimensions to vary and have 4 come out ... talk about the Planckian physics - and loop quantum gravity tries to - I ...
    (sci.physics.research)
Loading