Re: Swift grb satelitte

From: sean (jaymoseley_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/10/04 

Date: 10 Dec 2004 06:14:30 -0800

Luigi Caselli wrote:
> "sean" <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:40f80aa1.0411160844.8b2fe5@posting.google.com...
> > SWIFT PREDICTIONS
> > The Swift grb satelitte launches tommorow!! Its observations will
> > mark the end of the standard model.
> >
> > Rather than being hypernovas with relativistic beaming , GRBs can
be
> > explained as follows...
> <snip>

Swift should detect no redshift for GRB`s from the xray spectra

The UVOT ccd cameras should confirm my prediction that there are
multiple rebrightenings in the light curve. Moreso than any
beamed theory can account for.The shorter the bin times
(exposure times) the more rebrightenings will become observable
per burst. By this I mean that for example if a grb has 2 peaks
per second a 1 sec bin would show only 1 peak but a 1/4 sec bin
would show 2 peaks.
Or also if a grb had 1 peak every 5 seconds each peak lasting
a sec than a 5 sec bin would show a lower mag peak and 5
one sec bins would have 4 bins with no peak and 1 bin with a
much higher mag peak as it hasnt been averaged out over 5 sec.

Also shorter bin times should show that the rebrightenings or
multiple peaks should be greater in magnitude than previously
observed. This is because up till now the longer exposure
times average out the peak of the rebrightenings to make them
appear less bright. Also the rebrightenings will appear always
to occur later in longer wavelengths. The progression will be
proportional to wavelength. So that (for example only )
the peak will appear at 0 sec in gamma, 0.01 in x ray 2 sec in
UV 20 sec in B and 25 in R and 250 in IR etc. (These numbers
in seconds are just a guide only to illustrate what I mean by
proportional to wavelength ie the longer the wavelength observed
the later the peak is observed to occur)

I noticed the new google beta does not display the illustrations
in my first post correctly
So I`m reposting part of the original post with the illustrations
corrected for the new google beta page size. To get the full text
of predictions and explanations as to what the theory is behind
my predictions go to my first post in this thread.

Sean www.gammarayburst.com

If SWIFT is able to take multiple spectrum images of early optical
bursts in the first few hours post grb detection(as was done for
030329 over weeks) we would see that over minutes and hours the
main spikey features in the spectral lightcurve would appear to
`animate` smoothly from the blue end (A to B below) to red end of
the spectrum in the images. So over a certain time a feature
that occurs between 300nm and 600nm would eventually be seen
stretched to 600nm and 1200nm and on to radio etc.

A .
. .
. . >>>>>>>>
. .
. .
. .
300nm 600nm 900nm

B
.
. .
. . >>>>>>>>>>
. .
. . .
. .
300nm 600nm 900nm

Also the shorter the time frame of the exposure of the CCD the more
detail will emerge.As the grb lightcurve time scale is equivelent
to the wavelength axis of the emmision spectrum and as there are
many peaks in spectra more `peaks` will emerge in shorter ccd
exposure times for SWIFT. This will give the appearance of more
numerous rapid rebrightenings than current theory allows.
And with the ability to observe almost simultaneously in different
wavelengths SWIFT will also see these rebrightenings always
occuring at later times in longer wavelengths. Ie/ a rebrightening
observed in UV will appear to peak slightly later in optical.
If SWIFT observes a burst with enough detail in its Gamma X UV OT
filter bands it should be possible to chart features that first
occur in gamma then appearing seconds later in X and then minutes
or hours later in UV and then in optical. This will be a
progression directly proportional to wavelength so that if it takes
10 seconds for the `spike` to move from 1nm to 10nm then it will
take 100 seconds to move from 10nm to 100nm.

The reason why there appear to be these bursts or `explosions` in
any observed wavelength is that we are observing the emmision
spectra of a very distant star being constantly redshifted over
time.
All observations are made in narrow band widths and the flux
intensity observed always appears to increase and then decrease.
This isnt due to an explosion but rather due to the fact that at
any one observed wavelength the main hump of the stars observable
flux, or observed energy emmitted, will be redshifted across that
particular wavelength. So for instance below we have the blackbody
emmision spectra of the star shown by the dotted line peaking at c
and a ccd camera observing at a particular wavelength x. Over time
the spectral hump of the star is redshifted to longer wavelengths.

X
c |
. |
. . |
. . |
. .|
. . . .

shorter wavelengths.........longer wavelengths

(over time the hump at c gets redshifted to the right and the
observed flux at x wavelength first increases then decreases
as c redshifts or `stretches` past x)

The effect then at the ccd camera at x nm would be that the
observed flux increases as c is redshifted. When c and the
rest of the `hump` is stretched to longer wavelengths than x,
the observed flux at x will then appear to diminish. The
lightcurve profile of the flux intensity observed at x
mimics the spectral profile of the redshifted stars light
shown below at c. As the redshifting or decceleration
of the light is proportional to wavelength the speed at which
the hump passes by x will be faster if x is at a shorter
wavelength. Thus the entire spectral hump will be redshifted
past x much faster if x was observing in gamma than if x were
observing in UV for instance. This makes the observations in
shorter wavelengths appear to occur much faster.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Looking for "New Earth" around Alpha Centauri
    ... > shorter than the Empire State Building on the ground outside the ... it breaks down is that your analogue for "observing" (the height of the ... using electromagnetic radiation has *two* dimensions you can work on - ... The first wavelength is the peak wavelength of a black body ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Looking for "New Earth" around Alpha Centauri
    ... > shorter than the Empire State Building on the ground outside the ... it breaks down is that your analogue for "observing" (the height of the ... using electromagnetic radiation has *two* dimensions you can work on - ... The first wavelength is the peak wavelength of a black body ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: No telescope at wavelengths of 12.5 nm to 125 nm?
    ... that is observing over any part of the wavelength range of 12.5 nm to ... aluminium is a great reflector of UV at energies up to ... They are white dwarf stars that are accreting matter so ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: No telescope at wavelengths of 12.5 nm to 125 nm?
    ... that is observing over any part of the wavelength range of 12.5 nm to ... aluminium is a great reflector of UV at energies up to ... They are white dwarf stars that are accreting matter so ...
    (sci.astro)
  • NASAs Swift satellite catches first supernova in the act of exploding (Forwarded)
    ... NASA'S SWIFT SATELLITE CATCHES FIRST SUPERNOVA IN THE ACT OF EXPLODING ... "For years we have dreamed of seeing a star just as it was exploding, ... Although astronomers were lucky that Swift was observing NGC 2770 just ...
    (sci.space.news)