Re: Pioneer 10 test of light speed delay
r9ns_at_verizon.net
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: Gactimus: "Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Previous message: r9ns_at_verizon.net: "Re: Pioneer 10 test of light speed delay"
- In reply to: r9ns_at_verizon.net: "Re: Pioneer 10 test of light speed delay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Dec 2004 15:01:13 -0800
r9ns@verizon.net wrote:
> George Dishman wrote:
> > <r9ns@verizon.net> wrote in message
> The average difference between the observed and predicted
> frequency is 10^-4Hz.
This is not quite correct. This is the difference between two
different estimates of K where one is a function of the observed
received frequency. The differences between the observed and predicted
frequencies using the nearly instantaneous model are calculated
according to the method shown in
http://mysite.verizon.net/r9ns/trj071087.xls
> r9ns@verizon.net
e
- Next message: Gactimus: "Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Previous message: r9ns_at_verizon.net: "Re: Pioneer 10 test of light speed delay"
- In reply to: r9ns_at_verizon.net: "Re: Pioneer 10 test of light speed delay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]