Re: Cosmic acceleration rediscovered
alistolmar_at_3dresearch.com
Date: 01/28/05
- Next message: Nicolaas Vroom: "Re: Perihelion of Mercury with classical mechanics ?"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Relativistic CMB"
- In reply to: George Dishman: "Re: Cosmic acceleration rediscovered"
- Next in thread: George Dishman: "Re: Cosmic acceleration rediscovered"
- Reply: George Dishman: "Re: Cosmic acceleration rediscovered"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jan 2005 06:40:28 -0800
What you quoted from Ned is indeed meaningless.
One more time: I have produced the observed so called CMBR curve from
star light observed here and originated in an infinite and homogeneous
Universe.
The positive result is achieved by assigning star (galaxy) density and
surface area and temperature to the objects shining and allowing for
the photon energy loss during propagation. With the correct
'half-life', defined from the observed nuclear properties.
The fact that the assigned surface area will not only shine, but
cover-up and block anything in the farther away parts of the Universe
is being attempted to be forgotten here... even this is the resolution
of the Olbers' wall of stars paradox.
I also ran the program with a cut-off coverage, but in the referred
case it was also substituting the dust and black objects in the
galaxies, to result in the very plausible star (galaxy) densities and
average star sizes and temperatures. Refining this method will result a
precise global characteristic of the Universe and could be used as tool
to interpret the large scale structures in different directions.
No, the frequency could not continue down to zero, because the galaxies
between the farther away sources of radiation will block it before it
can reach us. However, I think so that some of the radio sources is a
distant galaxy, shining in UV and detected in radio, where the Olbers'
wall of star is not so dense, shining through - as we see thanks to
Halton Arp some of distant galaxies and quasars.
http://stolmarphysics.com/Ned1.htm
Try this link - my provider reorganised the pages, I have to update -
when I will have time??!!
Cheers!
Aladar
http://stolmarphysics.com
- Next message: Nicolaas Vroom: "Re: Perihelion of Mercury with classical mechanics ?"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Relativistic CMB"
- In reply to: George Dishman: "Re: Cosmic acceleration rediscovered"
- Next in thread: George Dishman: "Re: Cosmic acceleration rediscovered"
- Reply: George Dishman: "Re: Cosmic acceleration rediscovered"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|