Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging"
From: Greg Hennessy (greg.hennessy_at_tantalus.cox.net)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Claus Tondering: "Calendar FAQ, v. 2.7 (modified 15 January 2005) Part 1/3"
- Previous message: harald.vanlintel_at_epfl.ch: "Re: Perihelion of Mercury with classical mechanics ?"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: Tom Capizzi: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: Tom Roberts: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:20:22 +0000 (UTC)
In article <7gJKd.10374$B5.3390@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Androcles <dummy@dummy.net> wrote:
> Why is the act of looking at the star "clearly" cooling it?
>
> Or look at a human being through night vision IR devices, perhaps....
>
> It isn't "clear" to me at all, since the source was radiating anyway.
Temperature is defined for a source in equilibrium. Pedantically
speaking, if the source is radiating, it does not have a temperature.
- Next message: Claus Tondering: "Calendar FAQ, v. 2.7 (modified 15 January 2005) Part 1/3"
- Previous message: harald.vanlintel_at_epfl.ch: "Re: Perihelion of Mercury with classical mechanics ?"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: Tom Capizzi: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Reply: Tom Roberts: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
