Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem
From: JP (jp_at_nospam.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Jack Sarfatti: "US Navy Submarine C^3 & Recent Russian/Brazilian Torsion Physics Breakthroughs"
- Previous message: Art Deco: "Re: kookdancers digest"
- In reply to: Nora Baron: "Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:34:02 +0000
Sorry to top post but this cracks me up!
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:19:40 -0800, Nora Baron wrote:
> Jack Sarfatti wrote:
>> Change A^abu to Abuc below
>>
>
> Right.
>
>
>> A^abu are globally constant "phases" canonically conjugate to the Sab
>
>> space-time rotation Lie algebra generators of O(1,3). When O(1,3) is
>> locally gauged then the spin connection coefficients are arbitrary
>> functions in which the torsion tensor field of Gennady Shipov is the
>> compensating field. This is beyond 1916 GR.
>>
>> That is
>>
>> A^abc are globally constant "phases" canonically conjugate to the Sab
>
>> space-time rotation Lie algebra generators of O(1,3). When O(1,3) is
>> locally gauged then the spin connection coefficients are arbitrary
>> functions in which the torsion tensor field of Gennady Shipov is the
>> compensating field. This is beyond 1916 GR.
>>
>
> Yes, this second version of the paragraph makes total sense,
> whereas the first version was utterly impenetrable gibberish.
> I must confess that after reading the first paragraph, I thought,
> "Who is this nitwit Shipov, and why is he stealing radishes from
> my garden?" Whereas now I see that Gennady Shipov is the greatest
> genius of all time and his torsion tensor field is among the very
> finest of torsion tensor fields available in retail outlets around
> the world. I do not begrudge him a single radish. As for 1916
> GR, yes. Totally beyond. As AE himself would have said, das
> ist klar! It is Jack's terse but brilliant addition of the phrase
> 'That is' which explains all and causes the scales to fall from
> one's eyes.
>
>
>> Of course A^abu is a VARIABLE, but only because of the T4
> compensating
>> field Bu^a in
>>
>> eu^a = (Kronecker Delta)u^a + Bu^a
>>
>> since
>>
>> A^abu(x) = eu^b(x)A^abc
>
>
> Now here by contrast, we see the sad effect of trying to water
> down the truth for the mass market, and it brings nothing but
> humiliation to the author. Making Zielinski's breathtaking oeuvre
> accessible to the average pro wrestling fan is simply not necessary
> OR sufficient, and unlikely to bring trinkgeld into one's coffers,
> eh? So why bring it up? Spare us your apologies. I do hope
> sci.military appreciates the implications however.
>
> Nora B.
- Next message: Jack Sarfatti: "US Navy Submarine C^3 & Recent Russian/Brazilian Torsion Physics Breakthroughs"
- Previous message: Art Deco: "Re: kookdancers digest"
- In reply to: Nora Baron: "Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
