Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>

From: Warhol (molarh_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/08/05 

Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:17:23 +0100

"DrPostman" <Looky@mysig.foremail> a écrit dans le message de news:
f8tf01979r3v1vrkj5nbh2qidnqc98k4k3@4ax.com...
> On 7 Feb 2005 11:17:19 -0800, lensman1955@hotmail.com in accordance
> with The Prophecy scribed:
>
> >Maybe he's thinking of Arthur C. Clarke's story where the astronauts
> >set off a chemical reaction that could be viewed from Earth. (Humor
> >moment, someone sabotauged the experiment and instead of just a bright
> >yellow glow, the Earth saw the Coca Cola logo!) Of course, there is the
> >point that no one in NASA realized they would have to justify and
> >proove what they did decades later!
>
>
> This is always worth reposting:
> A fellow named Allen Morgan posted this over a year ago in
> response to why they didn't set off a bomb or leave a big
> mirror to prove that they went there:
>
>
> NASA: Oh, Mr. Armstrong, there's one more thing.
> Armstrong: What's that.
> NASA: We'd like you to take a really, really large bomb with you on
> the Lunar Lander. Don't worry, we've budgeted for space. Haven't we
> Bob?
> Bob: You betcha. 200 tons of TNT.
> NASA: 400.
> Bob: Oh. 400. Right.
> Armstrong: Excuse me, a what?
> NASA: Bomb. Really big one.
> Armstrong: Might I ask why?
> NASA: So that you can set it off on the moon.
> Armstrong: And....?
> NASA: So that we can see it here on Earth
> Armstrong: ??
> NASA: Well, it would be really cool. And it would prove you went
> there.
> Armstrong: Are you out of your mind?
> NASA: Don't worry, we have a really long detonator cord that you can
> use to set it off.
> Armstrong: You bozos think I'm going to land on the moon strapped to
> 200 tons
> Bob: 400 tons:
> Armstrong: Shut-up pencil neck. 400 tons of explosive????? Did you
> decide that this wasn't difficult enough and you wanted to add some
> more danger? Are you guys out of your gourd? What purpose does it
> serve? What if it goes off on the descent?
> NASA: That would *rock*. Suck. Not rock. It would suck, that would
> be tragic.
> Armstrong: I can't believe this.
> NASA: Well, if you don't like that we can ditch it. We have another
> idea.
> Armstrong: Oh good.
> NASA: We'd like you to take a large mirror up there.
> Armstrong: Ah, for laser ranging and such. Excellent science.
> NASA: Nah, this is so that we can see it from Earth.
> Armstrong: What?!?!? How big is this thing?
> NASA: Bob?
> Bob: A couple of miles across.
> Armstrong: Uh?
> Bob: Don't worry, it's mylar. Doesn't weigh more than about 50 tons.
> Armstrong: 2 miles?
> Bob (excitedly): Well, the moon is quite a long way away. If we want
> to be able to see the mirror from Earth then it is going to have to
> cover a couple of seconds of arc at least. You can do the math
> yourself. I like math.
> Armstrong: How the hell am I supposed to spread out a mirror that is 2
> *miles* across on the moon?????
> NASA: Well, you'll have help.
> Aldrin: Don't look at me. I have a bad back.
>
>

Yea but it's still funny watching them come up with their "proof" the images
and video who are fake. The 200 tons of TNT is what I would call the proof,
that will keep our mouth's shout, we the unbelievers, when that light shall
shine on the moon. Than Maybe I shall start to pray again towards the Nasa
Temple. But as long they can't show me a F-eking light on that moon.

I will keep my back towards those Fake Nasa High Priest. They can't even
save the world from "Temple One" that shall hit the Earth in 2012 and that
PROOF I shall Give on the 4 of July 2005. Stupid Magog's can't even destroy
a little rock. Yea, it isn't the Nasa that shall save us.

My serpent shall eat the serpent of the Zog's, do you Remember this story
People? the Rod's (staff) story's and the pharaoh. Could it be that the
ancients Egyptians went to the moon !!! they to had Rod'ss that transformed
in Serpent's.

Yeah this world is still full of mystery's, and they want to take us already
to the moon.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>
    ... >set off a chemical reaction that could be viewed from Earth. ... NASA: Oh, Mr. Armstrong, there's one more thing. ... Bob: You betcha. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: OT: Did any of you LIBS hear about this.....?
    ... It already infuriates me that Obama canceled the NASA programs all set ... cancellations were pretty judicious, ... Neil Armstrong, who rarely makes public comments, was the first human ... And Apollo 17 commander Gene Cernan ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: Oh, How The Mighty Have Fallen...
    ... the wrong guy to be the first to step on the Moon IMO. ... Official NASA documentaries or private ones? ... in any way creates an obligation for Armstrong. ... Either or...It's only my desire to want to know more about Armstrong. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Oh, How The Mighty Have Fallen...
    ... Neal Armstrong may as well be JD Salinger...they picked ... decent person. ... I'm not talking about that...I'm talking about documentary type stuff ... Official NASA documentaries or private ones? ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>
    ... > | America's Moon Expedition a Fake? ... > good sources on what that technology can and cannot do. ... > NASA administrator Jim Webb into the Oval Office and reminded him to keep ... Here the conspiracy theorists try to manufacture a discrepancy. ...
    (sci.astro)