Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>
From: Warhol (molarh_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Sir Gilligan Horry: "Re: Plonk This"
- Previous message: josephus: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- In reply to: Jay Windley: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Reply: Art Deco: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Reply: Jay Windley: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 03:11:07 +0100
"Jay Windley" <webmaster@clavius.org> a écrit dans le message de news:
cubges$iaj$1@news.xmission.com...
>
> "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:36srr2F5539pcU1@individual.net...
> |
> | No, I will run, for the highste seat ever, King of the Worlds.
>
> So you're not against government. You're only against people other than
you
> having power.
>
Yes I am against all those who don't respect the ten commandments, it's time
that zog stop killing in the name of God. And power must be given back to
the tribes, the children of god. that's how i see things. Enough lies, will
everybody say. Mark my words. I know you would not choose for me, because
you are afraid of the father in the heavens. I say to you don't be afraid,
because the father loves all his children who want to listen to his
commands.
> | what you said is stupid propaganda...
>
> Then it should be easy for you to show how and why it's factually
incorrect.
> Anyone can protest in words only that someone else is wrong. It takes
> someone of actual skill and understanding to demonstrate the wrongness of
> someone else's ideas.
>
you are joking? right. Come on, how many years shall we go on with this
lies. The day you can go back to the moon, warne me. Till than, i shall
believe in my religion, and say whatever my religion permits me to say.
> | ...and I see no reason to argue with someone of lower intellectual
> | level than me.
>
> I see no evidence yet that this is the case, and considerable evidence so
> far that it is not the case. Demonstrating how your critics are wrong
> (rather than simply asserting that they are) might provide evidence that
you
> have high intellectual ability. Quoting Pravda nonsense doth not you
> erudite make.
>
It's not that you are working as decorator in a theater that makes you an
expert on moon Questions. And it's not me that you have to crusade, you know
what i think about moon Religion. No it's the daily growing mass's that
don't believe in the Nasa temple high priest anymore.
And were I go look for information is not your bizness, But one has only to
google and he finds what he is looking for. so easy, and so shall the Zog
empire fall.
I only know that the Staff TEMPLE 1, of the archangel is there and the
Nasa's Staff serpents, can't stop it. And that they proof to the world this
time that, they can. That would be already a good proof. The staff of Moses
against the staff of the Nasa High Temple with their fake miracles. I
wondering wich serpent shall eat the other. I am sure you shall declare the
ancient egyptians had no submarines, sattelites, plains, helicopter's,
Internet and so one.
And even when I show you those facts in front of your eyes. You shall
continue claim that we are the Liars. So you see there is no way to make
magog understand they are only living in the Zog Matrix. till they shall see
the second sun, with the ten pleads ass the Egyptians have seen? SHALL THE
ZOG TEMPLE SAVE THE WORLD, or shall be a simple Moorish man with his temple
who shall take over that task, on him again? that would be the right
question. and who to believe.
> | could you a actually answer how a university in India had a sample
> | moon Rocks before the Magogs took off to any distance above the surface
> | of the earth.
>
> That depends on whether you can provide any verifiable evidence of your
> premise.
>
Go to india and ask them, or do google search and you shall find.
> --
> |
> The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley
> to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org
>
- Next message: Sir Gilligan Horry: "Re: Plonk This"
- Previous message: josephus: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- In reply to: Jay Windley: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Reply: Art Deco: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Reply: Jay Windley: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|