Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>

From: Jay Windley (webmaster_at_clavius.org)
Date: 02/09/05 

Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:16:41 -0700

"Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:36t74nF55iu7cU5@individual.net...
|
|
| There is no mystery, except in the minds of people too dense
| to understand.

Yes, and that would be you. The whole moon landing hoax theory is based on
creating a "mystery" out of straightforward things that
scientifically-minded people understand, but which the conspiracy
theorists -- none of them a scientist or engineer -- do not understand.
They then translate their personal ignorance into some sort of debaucle or
dilemma that they try to pin on NASA.

Sorry, Warhol. I understand space technology and you do not. You're the
dense one here.

| You zog need to come with proof, the world is asking questions
| and we don't get them.

I answered your questions. Every single one of them. Thoroughly, at
length.

The fact that you can't generate a meaningful followup to something you
simply copied from some web site is ample evidence you yourself don't have
the faintest idea what you're talking about. They're not even your
questions. They're not even the questions of the anonymous author from
which you cribbed your post; he just mindlessly parrotted Kaysing, Rene, and
Collier -- people with axes to grind and fabricated qualifications. And he
couldn't provide any followup either.

Clearly you are not anyone's intellectual equal here. I can write
book-length answers to any one of your questions. I can discuss any of them
for as long and in as much detail as you wish. You can't even go one step
beyond plagiarism.

| so stop telling story for kids. And show real proof

We did. What do you think you're trying so poorly to explain away?

I have shown proof of a hoax, but not the hoax you think. The real hoax is
people like Ralph Rene who pretend to be people they're not and bilk you out
of your money in order to read their groundless drivel. Do you think these
authors actually believe their own hype? They know exactly what they're
doing, and exactly whom to avoid in order to continue the charade of
"research" that covers up a simple scheme to make money off the gullible and
paranoid.

I chose Ralph Rene because I know personally he was offered $10,000 to
provide proof that NASA had claimed the doctored photo of Mike Collins was
an actual Gemini mission photo. He said he could, but refused to accept the
challenge. Believe me, these people know exactly what they're doing, and
you're all too eager to help them do it. 

-- 
                                          |
The universe is not required to conform   |  Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant.      |  webmaster @ clavius.org

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Olympic BSOD
    ... Are you working especially hard to appear dense? ... Bottom Line is it's a Hoax. ... Leave it to a Mactard to fall for it. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
    ... > Whether the KRS is genuine or a hoax, ... > mystery (and also a historical, linguistic, geological etc. ... the more doubtful historic subjects and not much about archeology. ... Paternity is a matter of opinion ...
    (sci.archaeology)