Re: NASA Claims No Life On Mars and Embargos Mars Rover Data.

From: dar7yl (no_reply_at_accepted.org)
Date: 02/20/05 

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:54:30 GMT

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in message
news:4217B9D9.14C65BA5@lifeform.org...
> February 19, 2005
>
> dar7yl wrote:
>> So they are actually releasing spectroscopy then?
>> I guess you are annoyed that they aren't spoon-feeding
>> you.
>
> No, they aren't releasing it, we had to hack into that.
> Notice the clockcount, that data has not been released yet.
> It's not listed, and the folders are password protected.

So as well as being an idiot, you are also a thief.

>> >> Hasn't it occurred to you that these people
>> >> are very busy with the backlog of images
>> >> and spectroscopy, and don't have time to
>> >> continuously update the web, let alone respond
>> >> to your immature ravings?
>> >
>> > I just explained to you, the exploratorium and
>> > workbench are highly automated. Most of the
>> > hard work is done by the rover drivers, and
>> > one of the reasons they are not investigating
>> > apparent fossils is that they don't want to
>> > risk banging the rover, and they have already
>> > publicly admitted they have no intention of
>> > discovering life with this mission, as that will
>> > put all future NASA Mars missions at risk.
>>
>> I think their statement was that the MER objectives
>> are to find evidence of past water on Mars. The
>> rovers are not designed to discover life (for instance,
>> the microscope cannot resolve bacteria).
>
> But it can resolve microbial mats, which it surely is.

How would you know it's microbial mats? You are just
wishing it were so.

> But not evidence of life, as NASA has publicly stated.

When? Where? Please quote this reference.

(And don't just give me a url - take the effort to copy
 or retype the actual quote, and footnote it as if you
are doing real science)

>> >> You should be happy that they are releasing
>> >> new information on a practically daily basis.
>> >
>> > They aren't, that's what I just explained to you.
>>
>> You blathered, slobbered and gibbered, but
>> there was no information in your rantings.
>
> No, I clearly demonstrated with evidence
> that the data is easily released by not
> password protecting the folders that
> contain it.

If they wanted you to have the data, you would
have access to it. Obviously, they also think you
are an idiot.

>> >> Yes, I have noticed a dwindling of activity,
>> >> which I attribute, not to conspiracy, but to
>> >> simple burn-out after over a year of
>> >> (most excellent IMHO) scientific study.
>> >
>> > Only because you are a confirmed idiot.
>> > I've already demonstrated that you are
>> > not actually looking at the data anyways.
>
> Meanwhile, NASA continues to deny there is
> any evidence for life on Mars, when our eyes
> and all of the evidence clearly indicates that
> there is, while doing everything it can to
> prevent further evidence from surfacing.

Your eyes haven't strayed farther than two feet
from your couch. There is no clear evidence of
life on Mars (yet).

> Then there are those idiots who tow that
> party line without even looking at the evidence,
> like you, for instance, and only contribute by
> ineffectual debunking of the truth. Are you
> on some kind of government grant payroll?

I contribute by debunking your insane blatherings.

> Do you actively debunk Global Warming
> and stem cell research too?

We need Global Warming to counteract Nuclear Winter :)

regards,
    Dar7yl

Relevant Pages

  • Re: NASA Claims No Life On Mars and Embargos Mars Rover Data.
    ... > dar7yl wrote: ... > No, they aren't releasing it, we had to hack into that. ... >> are to find evidence of past water on Mars. ... >> rovers are not designed to discover life (for instance, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: NASA Claims No Life On Mars and Embargos Mars Rover Data.
    ... > dar7yl wrote: ... > No, they aren't releasing it, we had to hack into that. ... >> are to find evidence of past water on Mars. ... >> rovers are not designed to discover life (for instance, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Did Rose throw games?
    ... He may have had SOME evidence about this, but nothing at the time to ... But what's to really stop him or anyone in the know from releasing this ... if Rose really did bet against the team ... Hall in the million years (and lose much of his die hard fan base). ...
    (rec.sport.baseball)
  • Re: Redhat Future?
    ... >>The evidence is they have already said they are going to be releasing ... >>that aint no way to run a ballroom. ...
    (linux.redhat)