Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery
From: Anthony Buckland (buckland_at_direct.ca)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Ross: "Re: digest, volume 2453427"
- Previous message: Heinrich Mueller: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:20:33 -0800
robert j. kolker wrote:
>
>
> doktorf wrote:
>
>> It would have gone a long way toward establishing them as a seperate
>> class of objects before any assumptions about their being planets could
>> develop.
>
>
> The classification of Pluto as a planet was probably a mistake (but
> who knew at the time?), and we are stuck with it now. Well, we have
> Pluto. How soon will we have Mickey, Goofey and Donald?
>
> Bob Kolker
About the same time we discover that they were in the Roman pantheon :)
For the last few years, I've been regarding Pluto and its satellite as
binary planets,
the only known ones in our system (Earth-Moon doesn't count since the center
of gravity is within Earth).
- Next message: Ross: "Re: digest, volume 2453427"
- Previous message: Heinrich Mueller: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|