Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery
From: Dan Drake (dd_at_dandrake.com)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Art Deco: "Re: digest, volume 2453427"
- Previous message: Art Deco: "Re: kookdancers digest"
- In reply to: doktorf: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:29:34 GMT
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:58:28 UTC, "doktorf" <doktorf@tiac.net> wrote:
> Clyde Tombaugh discovered Pluto by tusing a blink microscope to examine
> photographic plates. The discovery was not only probable, but
> inevitable with the only variable being the date. 1930 is a pretty
> early date to find a tiny KBO, but it was bound to be spotted sooner or
> later.
> There are a couple of things about Pluto. The original estimates of
> its size were hugely magnified. If you look in older text books , it is
> generally given a mass around that of Mars.
The story they told us about the discovery of Pluto when I was a kid was
that it was found in a deliberate search for the next planet (hence the
use of the blink microscope), based on the same kind of orbital-deviation
calculations that had led to the official discovery of Neptune.
Perhaps if those Pluto-finding calculations were re-run today, in cold
blood and with suitable error bars, it would turn out that they had no
validity like 0 significant figures, and the discovery might as well have
been by pure luck. Does anybody *know* of such an analysis? Or was the
story that was current 20-30 years after the discovery just BS?
(Apparently Neptune's orbit is still less clearly known than one would
like; hence the interest in Galileo's apparent extremely early data
point.)
Anyway, if they *thought* they'd found Pluto by gravitational effects, it
would be natural to assume that it was big enough to have some effect.
And assumptions die embarrassingly hard in science (see also Millikan).
-- dd@dandrake.com http://www.dandrake.com/
- Next message: Art Deco: "Re: digest, volume 2453427"
- Previous message: Art Deco: "Re: kookdancers digest"
- In reply to: doktorf: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|