Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations
macromitch_at_internetCDS.com
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: israel: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Previous message: r9ns_at_verizon.net: "Re: Pioneer 10 test of light speed delay"
- In reply to: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Next in thread: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Reply: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Feb 2005 16:55:56 -0800
chosp wrote:
> "Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1109397273.659315.107880@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > Of course your list misses the primary:
> > Absolute truth.
> >
> > Absolute truth exists.
>
> This is mere belief.
Wrong. And I can prove it to you.
You can't say there is no absolute truth.
If you say absolutes don't exist
then you can't say "absolutely not" to absolute truth
now can you?
> >
> > Truth is meant to be known.
>
> Meant by whom?
Get a clue you slimeball.
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
- Next message: israel: "Re: Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here>>>"
- Previous message: r9ns_at_verizon.net: "Re: Pioneer 10 test of light speed delay"
- In reply to: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Next in thread: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Reply: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
